Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2015

Identification and characterization of mouse otic sensory lineage genes.

Byron H Hartman, Robert Durruthy-Durruthy, Roman D Laske, Steven Losorelli, Stefan Heller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cannabinoid Signaling in Auditory Function and Development.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byron H HartmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA.
Robert Durruthy-DurruthyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA.
Roman D LaskeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA.
Steven LosorelliDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA.
Stefan HellerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

INNER EAR PROGENITOR CELLSR01DC006167 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HELLER, STEFAN · 2003 to 2013
$4.0M
Stanford OHNS Core CenterP30DC010363 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HELLER, STEFAN · 2009 to 2016
$3.0M
Patient derived sensory hair- and supporting cell-like cellsR01DC012250 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HELLER, STEFAN · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Genetic Control of Otic InductionF32DC013210 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMAN, BYRON HANEY · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC013210NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC010363NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006167NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate embryogenesis gives rise to all cell types of an organism through the development of many unique lineages derived from the three primordial germ layers. The otic sensory lineage arises from the otic vesicle, a structure formed through invagination of placodal non-neural ectoderm. This developmental lineage possesses unique differentiation potential, giving rise to otic sensory cell populations including hair cells, supporting cells, and ganglion neurons of the auditory and vestibular organs. Here we present a systematic approach to identify transcriptional features that distinguish the otic sensory lineage (from early otic progenitors to otic sensory populations) from other major lineages of vertebrate development. We used a microarray approach to analyze otic sensory lineage populations including microdissected otic vesicles (embryonic day 10.5) as well as isolated neonatal cochlear hair cells and supporting cells at postnatal day 3. Non-otic tissue samples including periotic tissues and whole embryos with otic regions removed were used as reference populations to evaluate otic specificity. Otic populations shared transcriptome-wide correlations in expression profiles that distinguish members of this lineage from non-otic populations. We further analyzed the microarray data using comparative and dimension reduction methods to identify individual genes that are specifically expressed in the otic sensory lineage. This analysis identified and ranked top otic sensory lineage-specific transcripts including Fbxo2, Col9a2, and Oc90, and additional novel otic lineage markers. To validate these results we performed expression analysis on select genes using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Fbxo2 showed the most striking pattern of specificity to the otic sensory lineage, including robust expression in the early otic vesicle and sustained expression in prosensory progenitors and auditory and vestibular hair cells and supporting cells.

Indexed as

cochleainner earmicroarraytranscriptomevestibular

Identifiers

PMID25852475
PMCPMC4365716
OpenAlexW2061948304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.