Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852470›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2015

Contribution of sublinear and supralinear dendritic integration to neuronal computations.

Alexandra Tran-Van-Minh, Romain D Cazé, Therése Abrahamsson, Laurence Cathala, Boris S Gutkin, David A DiGregorio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A dendritic substrate for temporal diversity of cortical inhibition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra Tran-Van-MinhUnit of Dynamic Neuronal Imaging, Department of Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur Paris, France.
Romain D CazéGroup for Neural Theory, LNC INSERM U960, Institut d'Etude de la Cognition de l'Ecole normale supérieure, Ecole normale supérieure Paris, France ; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London London, UK.
Therése AbrahamssonUnit of Dynamic Neuronal Imaging, Department of Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur Paris, France ; Center for Research in Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital Montreal, QC, Canada.
Laurence CathalaSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 6, UMR 8256 B2A, Team Brain Development, Repair and Aging Paris, France.
Boris S GutkinGroup for Neural Theory, LNC INSERM U960, Institut d'Etude de la Cognition de l'Ecole normale supérieure, Ecole normale supérieure Paris, France ; Federal Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia.
David A DiGregorioUnit of Dynamic Neuronal Imaging, Department of Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear dendritic integration is thought to increase the computational ability of neurons. Most studies focus on how supralinear summation of excitatory synaptic responses arising from clustered inputs within single dendrites result in the enhancement of neuronal firing, enabling simple computations such as feature detection. Recent reports have shown that sublinear summation is also a prominent dendritic operation, extending the range of subthreshold input-output (sI/O) transformations conferred by dendrites. Like supralinear operations, sublinear dendritic operations also increase the repertoire of neuronal computations, but feature extraction requires different synaptic connectivity strategies for each of these operations. In this article we will review the experimental and theoretical findings describing the biophysical determinants of the three primary classes of dendritic operations: linear, sublinear, and supralinear. We then review a Boolean algebra-based analysis of simplified neuron models, which provides insight into how dendritic operations influence neuronal computations. We highlight how neuronal computations are critically dependent on the interplay of dendritic properties (morphology and voltage-gated channel expression), spiking threshold and distribution of synaptic inputs carrying particular sensory features. Finally, we describe how global (scattered) and local (clustered) integration strategies permit the implementation of similar classes of computations, one example being the object feature binding problem.

Indexed as

binary neruonsBoolean analysisdendritesinput-output transformationneural computationnonlinear transformationsuncagingvotlage activated channels

Identifiers

PMID25852470
PMCPMC4371705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.