Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852395›Full record

ArticleNanoscale research letters2015

Au nanostructure arrays for plasmonic applications: annealed island films versus nanoimprint lithography.

Andrii M Lopatynskyi, Vitalii K Lytvyn, Volodymyr I Nazarenko, L Jay Guo, Brandon D Lucas, Volodymyr I Chegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale research letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrii M LopatynskyiDepartment of Functional Optoelectronics, V. E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics NASU, 41 Nauki avenue, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Vitalii K LytvynDepartment of Functional Optoelectronics, V. E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics NASU, 41 Nauki avenue, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Volodymyr I NazarenkoDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Laboratory of Nanobiotechnology, O. V. Palladin Institute of Biochemistry NASU, 9 Leontovycha street, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine.
L Jay GuoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 1301 Beal Avenue, MI 48109-2122 Ann Arbor, USA.
Brandon D LucasDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 1301 Beal Avenue, MI 48109-2122 Ann Arbor, USA.
Volodymyr I ChegelDepartment of Functional Optoelectronics, V. E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics NASU, 41 Nauki avenue, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper attempts to compare the main features of random and highly ordered gold nanostructure arrays (NSA) prepared by thermally annealed island film and nanoimprint lithography (NIL) techniques, respectively. Each substrate possesses different morphology in terms of plasmonic enhancement. Both methods allow such important features as spectral tuning of plasmon resonance position depending on size and shape of nanostructures; however, the time and cost is quite different. The respective comparison was performed experimentally and theoretically for a number of samples with different geometrical parameters. Spectral characteristics of fabricated NSA exhibited an expressed plasmon peak in the range from 576 to 809 nm for thermally annealed samples and from 606 to 783 nm for samples prepared by NIL. Modelling of the optical response for nanostructures with typical shapes associated with these techniques (parallelepiped for NIL and semi-ellipsoid for annealed island films) was performed using finite-difference time-domain calculations. Mathematical simulations have indicated the dependence of electric field enhancement on the shape and size of the nanoparticles. As an important point, the distribution of electric field at so-called 'hot spots' was considered. Parallelepiped-shaped nanoparticles were shown to yield maximal enhancement values by an order of magnitude greater than their semi-ellipsoid-shaped counterparts; however, both nanoparticle shapes have demonstrated comparable effective electrical field enhancement values. Optimized Au nanostructures with equivalent diameters ranging from 85 to 143 nm and height equal to 35 nm were obtained for both techniques, resulting in the largest electrical field enhancement. The application of island film thermal annealing method for nanochips fabrication can be considered as a possible cost-effective platform for various surface-enhanced spectroscopies; while the NIL-fabricated NSA looks like more effective for sensing of small-size objects.

Indexed as

Annealed island filmsLocalized surface plasmon resonanceNanoimprint lithographyNanostructuresPlasmonic enhancement

Identifiers

PMID25852395
PMCPMC4385248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.