Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852301›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2015

Temporal trends and current practice patterns for intraoperative ventilation at U.S. academic medical centers: a retrospective study.

Jonathan P Wanderer, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Richard H Epstein, Daryl J Kor, Raquel R Bartz, Ana Fernandez-Bustamante, Marcos F Vidal Melo, James M Blum

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04108130 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

An Anesthesia-Centered Bundle to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: The PRIME-AIR Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled794ConditionsPostoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsArmsPreoperative Education, Intraoperative PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) Individualization, Individualization of Neuromuscular Blockade, Postoperative Incentive Spirometry, Postoperative Ambulation
NCT07728214 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Reminder-enhanced Incentive Spirometry Evaluation (RISE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2026 to 2029Enrolled88ConditionsHypoxemiaArmsAlarms ON
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bedside assessment of lung aeration and stretch.British journal of anaesthesia · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan P WandererDepartments of Anesthesiology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, The Vanderbilt Clinic, 1301 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4648, Nashville, TN USA.
Jesse M EhrenfeldDepartments of Anesthesiology, Biomedical Informatics, Health Policy and Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA.
Richard H EpsteinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel College of Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Daryl J KorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
Raquel R BartzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA.
Ana Fernandez-BustamanteDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, CO USA.
Marcos F Vidal MeloDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
James M BlumDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA USA.
Vanderbilt University · USDuke University · USEmory University Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Regional Tidal Lung Strain and Neutrophilic Inflammation in Early Lung InjuryR01HL121228 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VIDAL MELO, MARCOS F · 2014 to 2023
$6.2M
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsR34HL123438 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VIDAL MELO, MARCOS F · 2015 to 2017
$599k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121228NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL123438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung protective ventilation strategies utilizing lower tidal volumes per predicted body weight (PBW) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been suggested to be beneficial in a variety of surgical populations. Recent clinical studies have used control groups ventilated with high tidal volumes without PEEP based on the assumption that this reflects current clinical practice. We hypothesized that ventilation strategies have changed over time, that most anesthetics in U.S. academic medical centers are currently performed with lower tidal volumes, and that most receive PEEP.

methodsIntraoperative data were pooled for adults undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Median tidal volumes per kilogram of PBW were categorized as > 10, 8-10 and < 8 mL per kg of PBW. The percentages of cases in 2013 that were performed with median tidal volumes < 8 mL per kg of PBW and PEEP were determined. As a secondary analysis, a proportional odds model using institution, year, height, weight and gender determined the relative associations of these factors using categorical and interquartile odds ratios.

results295,540 cases were analyzed from 5 institutions over a period of 10 years. In 2013, 59.3% of cases used median tidal volumes < 8 mL per kg of PBW, 83.3% used PEEP, and 51.0% used both. Of those cases with PEEP, 60.9% used a median pressure of ≥ 5 cmH2O. Predictors of lower categories of tidal volumes included height (odds ratio (OR) 10.83, 95% confidence interval [10.50, 11.16]), institution (lowest OR 0.98 [0.96, 1.00], highest OR 9.63 [9.41, 9.86]), year (lowest OR 1.32 [1.21, 1.44], highest OR 6.31 [5.84, 6.82]), male gender (OR 1.10 [1.07, 1.12]), and weight (OR 0.30 [0.29, 0.31]).

conclusionMost general anesthetics with tracheal intubation at the institutions surveyed are currently performed with a median tidal volume < 8 mL per kg of PBW, most are managed with PEEP of ≥ 5 cmH2O and approximately half utilize both. Given the diversity of the institutions included, this is likely reflective of practice in U.S. academic medical centers. The utilization of higher tidal volumes without PEEP in control groups for clinical research studies should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareIntubation, IntratrachealLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesTidal VolumeUnited StatesIntraoperative ventilationLung protective ventilationPractice patterns

Identifiers

PMID25852301
PMCPMC4387596
OpenAlexW2090525171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.