ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Endoscopic ultrasound elastography strain histograms in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Elastography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Endosonography-Elastography: Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography Strain Histograms in the Evaluation of Patients with Pancreatic Masses.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses.Qatar medical journal · 2021Article
- Present status of ultrasound elastography for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: review of the literature.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020Review
- Elastography of the Pancreas, Current View.Clinical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography and strain ratio, could it help in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic lesions?Medicine · 2018Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for solid pancreatic lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Review
- Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- The Role of Real Time Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Elastography for Targeting EUS-FNA of Suspicious Pancreatic Masses: A Review of the Literature and A Single Center Experience.JOP : Journal of the pancreas · 2016Article
- Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Pancreatic Cancer: a Challenge to Cure.The Indian journal of surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the accuracy of the strain histogram endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-based method for the diagnostic differentiation of patients with pancreatic masses.
methodsIn a prospective single center study, 149 patients were analyzed, 105 with pancreatic masses and 44 controls. Elastography images were recorded using commercially available ultrasound equipment in combination with EUS linear probes. Strain histograms (SHs) were calculated by machine integrated software in regions of interest and mean values of the strain histograms were expressed as Mode 1 (over the mass) and Mode 2 (over an adjacent part of pancreatic tissue, representing the reference area). The ratio between Mode 2 and Mode 1 was calculated later, representing a new variable, the strain histogram ratio. After the final diagnosis was established, two groups of patients were formed: a pancreatic cancer group with positive cytology achieved by fine needle aspiration puncture or histology after surgery (58 patients), and a mass-forming pancreatitis group with negative cytology and follow-up after 3 and 6 mo (47 patients). All statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).
resultsResults were obtained with software for strain histograms with reversed hue scale (0 represents the hardest tissue structure and 255 the softest). Based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve coordinates, the cut-off point for Mode 1 was set at the value of 86. Values under the cut-off point indicated the presence of pancreatic malignancy. Mode 1 reached 100% sensitivity and 45% specificity with overall accuracy of 66% (95%CI: 61%-66%) in detection of pancreatic malignant tumors among the patients with pancreatic masses. The positive and negative predictive values were 54% and 100%, respectively. The cut-off for the new calculated variable, the SH ratio, was set at the value 1.153 based on the ROC curve coordinates. Values equal or above the cut-off value were indicative of pancreatic malignancy. The SH ratio reached 98% sensitivity, 50% specificity and an overall accuracy of 69% (95%CI: 63%-70%). The positive and negative predictive values were 92% and 100%, respectively.
conclusionSH showed high sensitivity in pancreatic malignant tumor detection but disappointingly low specificity. Slight improvements in specificity and accuracy were achieved using the SH ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.