Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852170›Full record

ArticlePhysiological genomics2015

Exoelectrogenic capacity of host microbiota predicts lymphocyte recruitment to the gut.

Aaron Conrad Ericsson, Daniel John Davis, Craig Lawrence Franklin, Catherine Elizabeth Hagan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron Conrad EricssonMutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; University of Missouri Metagenomics Center (MUMC), University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; and Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri ericssona@missouri.edu.
Daniel John DavisDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Craig Lawrence FranklinMutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; University of Missouri Metagenomics Center (MUMC), University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; and Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Catherine Elizabeth HaganDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI James Amos-Landgraf · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
NIH HHS 5U42OD-010918-15NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrotaxis, directional cell movement in response to an electric potential, has been demonstrated in a wide range of cell types including lymphocytes. Exoelectrogens, microorganisms capable of generating electrical currents, have been identified in microbial fuel cells. However, no studies have investigated exoelectrogenic microbes in fresh feces or the effects of an exoelectrogenic microbiota on the host organism. Here we show that commensal gut microbial populations differ in their capacity for electrical current production by exoelectrogens and that those differences are predictive of increased lymphocyte trafficking to the gut in vivo, despite the lack of increased production of canonical lymphocyte-specific chemokines. Additionally, we demonstrate that the difference in current production between mice purchased from different commercial sources correlates reproducibly with the presence or absence of segmented filamentous bacteria, and while our data do not support a direct role for segmented filamentous bacteria in ex vivo current production, an exoelectrogenic microbiota can be transferred in vivo via mucosa-associated bacteria present in the ileum. Moreover, we detect upregulation of microbial genes associated with extracellular electron transfer in feces of mice colonized with exoelectrogenic microbiota containing segmented filamentous bacteria. While still correlative, these results suggest a novel means by which the gut microbiota modulates the recruitment of cells of the immune system to the gut.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsBase SequenceCell MovementComputational BiologyElectrolysisElectrophysiological PhenomenaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFluorometryGastric MucosaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractGene Expression RegulationGene LibraryImmunohistochemistryelectrotaxisexoelectrogenmicrobiotasegmented filamentous bacteria

Identifiers

PMID25852170
PMCPMC4491528
OpenAlexW2071907819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.