Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25852020›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2015

Hormone Use, Reproductive History, and Risk of Lung Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Studies.

Ann G Schwartz, Roberta M Ray, Michele L Cote, Judith Abrams, Robert J Sokol, Susan L Hendrix, Chu Chen, Rowan T Chlebowski, F Allan Hubbell, Charles Kooperberg and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Ann G Schwartz*Karmanos Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; †Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Washington; ‡C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; §St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, Michigan; ‖Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; ¶Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California; #Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California; **Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ††Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; ‡‡Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; §§Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ‖‖Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Buffalo, New York; and ¶¶Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
Roberta M Ray
Michele L Cote
Judith Abrams
Robert J Sokol
Susan L Hendrix
Chu Chen
Rowan T Chlebowski
F Allan Hubbell
Charles Kooperberg
JoAnn E Manson
Mary Jo O'Sullivan
Thomas Rohan
Marcia L Stefanick
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Heather Wakelee
Michael S Simon
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USWayne State University · USStanford University · USBuffalo State University · USHarvard University Press · USTrinity Health Oakland Hospital · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Miami · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS P30CA22453NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResults from the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials demonstrated no increase in the risk of lung cancer in postmenopausal women treated with hormone therapy (HT). We conducted a joint analysis of the Women's Health Initiative observational study data and clinical trials data to further explore the association between estrogen and estrogen-related reproductive factors and lung cancer risk.

methodsReproductive history, oral contraceptive use, and postmenopausal HT were evaluated in 160,855 women with known HT exposures. Follow-up for lung cancer was through September 17, 2012; 2467 incident lung cancer cases were ascertained, with median follow-up of 14 years.

resultsFor all lung cancers, women with previous use of estrogen plus progestin of less than 5 years (hazard ratio = 0.84; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.99) were at reduced risk. A limited number of reproductive factors demonstrated associations with risk. There was a trend toward decreased risk with increasing age at menopause (ptrend = 0.04) and a trend toward increased risk with increasing number of live births (ptrend = 0.03). Reduced risk of non-small-cell lung cancer was associated with age 20-29 years at first live birth. Risk estimates varied with smoking history, years of HT use and previous bilateral oophorectomy.

conclusionsIndirect measures of estrogen exposure to lung tissue, as used in this study, provide only weak evidence for an association between reproductive history or HT use and risk of lung cancer. More detailed mechanistic studies and evaluation of risk factors in conjunction with estrogen receptor expression in the lung should continue as a role for estrogen cannot be ruled out and may hold potential for prevention and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Reproductive HistoryWomen's HealthAgedClinical Trials as TopicContraceptives, Oral, HormonalEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRisk FactorsUnited StatesContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID25852020
PMCPMC4627490
OpenAlexW2017585913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.