Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25851818›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016

Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.

Gordana Pavlovic, John Diaper, Christoph Ellenberger, Angela Frei, Karim Bendjelid, Fanny Bonhomme, Marc Licker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Less Fluids and a More Physiological Approach.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gordana PavlovicDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
John DiaperDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christoph EllenbergerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Angela FreiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karim BendjelidDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fanny BonhommeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marc LickerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. marc-joseph.licker@hcuge.ch.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haemodynamic goal-directed therapies (GDT) may improve outcome following elective major surgery. So far, few data exist regarding haemodynamic optimization during emergency surgery. In this randomized, controlled trial, 50 surgical patients with hypovolemic or septic conditions were enrolled and we compared two algorithms of GDTs based either on conventional parameters and pressure pulse variation (control group) or on cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index and stroke volume variation as derived from the PiCCO monitoring system (optimized group). Postoperative outcome was estimated by a composite index including major complications and by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score within the first 3 days after surgery (POD1, POD2 and POD3). Data from 43 patients were analyzed (control group, N = 23; optimized group, N = 20). Similar amounts of fluid were given in the two groups. Intraoperatively, dobutamine was given in 45 % optimized patients but in no control patients. Major complications occurred more frequently in the optimized group [19 (95 %) versus 10 (40 %) in the control group, P < 0.001]. Likewise, SOFA scores were higher in the optimized group on POD1 (10.2 ± 2.5 versus 6.6 ± 2.2 in the control group, P = 0.001), POD2 (8.4 ± 2.6 vs 5.0 ± 2.4 in the control group, P = 0.002) and POD 3 (5.2 ± 3.6 and 2.2 ± 1.3 in the control group, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (13 % in the control group and 25 % in the optimized group). Haemodynamic optimization based on volumetric and flow PiCCO-derived parameters was associated with a less favorable postoperative outcome compared with a conventional GDT protocol during emergency surgery.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPatient Care PlanningAgedEmergency TreatmentFemaleFluid TherapyGeneral SurgeryHeart Function TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSecondary PreventionSensitivity and SpecificityCardiac outputEmergency surgeryHaemodynamic monitoringInotropesPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID25851818
OpenAlexW2143142313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.