ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2015
Reviewing post-publication peer review.
Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Challenges of Scientific Publishing: An Editor-In-Chief's Perspective.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Integrating community Live Reviews into academic publishing: an exploratory study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions.Materials horizons · 2024Review
- Studying Adherence to Reporting Standards in Kinesiology: A Post-publication Peer Review Brief Report.International journal of exercise science · 2024Article
- Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion.Learning & behavior · 2021Article
- From honest mistakes to fake news - approaches to correcting the scientific literature.Head & face medicine · 2020Article
- Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Review
- Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Open collaborative writing with Manubot.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications.Scientometrics · 2019Article
- Altmetric Analysis of Contemporary Iranian Medical Journals.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.PloS one · 2019Article
- Does peer review have a future?Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2019Article
- Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Review
- Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: theMolecular and cellular biology · 2018Article
- Altmetric analysis of contemporary dental literature.British dental journal · 2018Article
- The changing forms and expectations of peer review.Research integrity and peer review · 2018Review
- Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.