Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25851692›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Transcriptional refractoriness is dependent on core promoter architecture.

François Cesbron, Michael Oehler, Nati Ha, Gencer Sancar, Michael Brunner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antisense Transcription of theJournal of biological rhythms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non?Current opinion in systems biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Casein kinase 1 and disordered clock proteins form functionally equivalent, phospho-based circadian modules in fungi and mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Light sensing and responses in fungi.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. RNA polymerase II pausing as a context-dependent reader of the genome.Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

François CesbronBiochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
Michael OehlerBiochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
Nati HaBiochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
Gencer SancarBiochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
Michael BrunnerBiochemistry Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes are often transcribed in random bursts followed by long periods of inactivity. Here we employ the light-activatable white collar complex (WCC) of Neurospora to study the transcriptional bursting with a population approach. Activation of WCC by a light pulse triggers a synchronized wave of transcription from the frequency promoter followed by an extended period (∼1 h) during which the promoter is refractory towards restimulation. When challenged by a second light pulse, the newly activated WCC binds to refractory promoters and has the potential to recruit RNA polymerase II (Pol II). However, accumulation of Pol II and phosphorylation of its C-terminal domain repeats at serine 5 are impaired. Our results suggest that refractory promoters carry a physical memory of their recent transcription history. Genome-wide analysis of light-induced transcription suggests that refractoriness is rather widespread and a property of promoter architecture.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsLightTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticFeedback, PhysiologicalGene ExpressionNeurospora crassaPhosphorylationPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIDNA-Binding ProteinsFRQ protein, Neurospora crassaFungal ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IITranscription FactorsVVD protein, Neurospora crassawc-1 protein, Neurospora crassawhite collar 2 protein, Neurospora

Identifiers

PMID25851692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.