ArticleThe Annals of occupational hygiene2015
Carbon Nanotube and Nanofiber Exposure Assessments: An Analysis of 14 Site Visits.
Article in The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functionalised thin multi-walled carbon nanotubes are less toxic to lung cells in vitro than their native counterparts.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- A Novel Sampling and Analytical Framework for Airborne Carbon Nanotubes.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating occupational exposures to the graphene family of nanomaterials: Implications for worker safety and health.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2026Article
- The size distribution of nanoparticles emitted from advanced manufacturing devices impacts predicted carcinogenic potential.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Pulmonary inflammation and immune responses induced by nanocellulose: Insights fromCurrent research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Understanding toxicity associated with boron nitride nanotubes: Review of toxicity studies, exposure assessment at manufacturing facilities, and read-across.Journal of materials research · 2022Article
- Prospects of Polymeric Nanocomposite Membranes for Water Purification and Scalability and their Health and Environmental Impacts: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Real-Time Emission and Exposure Measurements of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes during Production, Power Sawing, and Testing of Epoxy-Based Nanocomposites.Annals of work exposures and health · 2022Article
- Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Assessment of the toxicity and carcinogenicity of double-walled carbon nanotubes in the rat lung after intratracheal instillation: a two-year study.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2022Article
- Revealing the structural and chemical properties of copper-based nanoparticles released from copper treated wood.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Histopathology of the broad class of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers used or produced in U.S. facilities in a murine model.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2021Article
- Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibres: More Than a Cobweb.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A transfer learning approach for improved classification of carbon nanomaterials from TEM images.Nanoscale advances · 2021Article
- Physicochemical characterization and genotoxicity of the broad class of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers used or produced in U.S. facilities.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2020Article
- The pulmonary toxicity of carboxylated or aminated multi-walled carbon nanotubes in mice is determined by the prior purification method.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2020Article
- Exposures during wet production and use processes of nanomaterials: a summary of 11 worksite evaluations.Industrial health · 2020Article
- Laboratory evaluation of a personal aethalometer for assessing airborne carbon nanotube exposures.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2020Article
- Mitsui-7, heat-treated, and nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes elicit genotoxicity in human lung epithelial cells.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent evidence has suggested the potential for wide-ranging health effects that could result from exposure to carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon nanofibers (CNF). In response, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) set a recommended exposure limit (REL) for CNT and CNF: 1 µg m(-3) as an 8-h time weighted average (TWA) of elemental carbon (EC) for the respirable size fraction. The purpose of this study was to conduct an industrywide exposure assessment among US CNT and CNF manufacturers and users. Fourteen total sites were visited to assess exposures to CNT (13 sites) and CNF (1 site). Personal breathing zone (PBZ) and area samples were collected for both the inhalable and respirable mass concentration of EC, using NIOSH Method 5040. Inhalable PBZ samples were collected at nine sites while at the remaining five sites both respirable and inhalable PBZ samples were collected side-by-side. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) PBZ and area samples were also collected at the inhalable size fraction and analyzed to quantify and size CNT and CNF agglomerate and fibrous exposures. Respirable EC PBZ concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 2.94 µg m(-3) with a geometric mean (GM) of 0.34 µg m(-3) and an 8-h TWA of 0.16 µg m(-3). PBZ samples at the inhalable size fraction for EC ranged from 0.01 to 79.57 µg m(-3) with a GM of 1.21 µg m(-3). PBZ samples analyzed by TEM showed concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 1.613 CNT or CNF-structures per cm(3) with a GM of 0.008 and an 8-h TWA concentration of 0.003. The most common CNT structure sizes were found to be larger agglomerates in the 2-5 µm range as well as agglomerates >5 µm. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the inhalable samples for the mass of EC and structure counts by TEM (Spearman ρ = 0.39, P < 0.0001). Overall, EC PBZ and area TWA samples were below the NIOSH REL (96% were <1 μg m(-3) at the respirable size fraction), while 30% of the inhalable PBZ EC samples were found to be >1 μg m(-3). Until more information is known about health effects associated with larger agglomerates, it seems prudent to assess worker exposure to airborne CNT and CNF materials by monitoring EC at both the respirable and inhalable size fractions. Concurrent TEM samples should be collected to confirm the presence of CNT and CNF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.