Trial reportRespiratory research2015
A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01383499 (A Phase II Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Incomplete Crossover Trial With 4-week Treatment Periods to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Incomplete Crossover Trial With 4-week Treatment Periods to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution (Doses of 1.25 µg, 2.5 µg and 5 µg) Delivered Via Respimat® Inhaler Once Daily in the Evening in Children 6 to 11 Yrs Old With Moderate Persistent Asthma
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Burden of Asthma and Role of 2.5 µg Tiotropium RespimatAdvances in therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Tiotropium add-on therapy is safe and reduces seasonal worsening in paediatric asthma patients.The European respiratory journal · 2019Trial
- A randomised controlled trial of tiotropium in adolescents with severe symptomatic asthma.The European respiratory journal · 2017Trial
- The Incidence, Mortality and Medical Expenditure in Patients with Asthma in Taiwan: Ten-year Nationwide Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2024Article
- Update on Long-Acting Anticholinergics in Children and Adolescents With Difficult and Severe Asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- A comparison of tiotropium, long-acting βRespiratory research · 2020Review
- Clinical predictors of asthmatics in identifying subgroup requiring long-term tiotropium add-on therapy: a real-world study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Preschool children with persistent asthmatic symptoms.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Future perspectives of anticholinergics for the treatment of asthma in adults and children.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Clinical efficacy and safety of anticholinergic therapies in pediatric patients.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Review
- New Drugs for Pediatric Asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
- Tiotropium for the Treatment of Asthma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.Canadian respiratory journal · 2018Review
- Long-acting muscarinic antagonists for the treatment of asthma in children-a new kid in town.Allergo journal international · 2018Review
- Tiotropium Bromide in Children and Adolescents with Asthma.Paediatric drugs · 2017Review
- Targeting acetylcholine receptor M3 prevents the progression of airway hyperreactivity in a mouse model of childhood asthma.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2017Article
- Positioning of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists in the Management of Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017Review
- Severe Asthma in Children.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017Review
- The evidence on tiotropium bromide in asthma: from the rationale to the bedside.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA considerable number of children with asthma remain symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, resulting in significant morbidity, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare costs and lost school days. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg and 1.25 μg add-on to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a leukotriene modifier, in children aged 6-11 years with symptomatic asthma.
methodsIn this Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, incomplete-crossover, dose-ranging study, patients were randomised to receive three of the four treatments evaluated: once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg or 1.25 μg or placebo Respimat®, in the evening during the 12-week (three × 4-week) treatment period.
resultsIn total, 76, 74, 75 and 76 patients aged 6-11 years received tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, 1.25 μg and placebo Respimat®, respectively. For the primary end point (peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured within 3 hours post-dosing), the adjusted mean responses with tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (272 mL), 2.5 μg (290 mL) and 1.25 μg (261 mL) were significantly greater than with placebo Respimat® (185 mL; p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0011, respectively). The safety and tolerability of all doses of tiotropium Respimat® were comparable with those of placebo Respimat®, with no serious adverse events and no events leading to discontinuation.
conclusionsTiotropium Respimat® add-on to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a leukotriene modifier, was efficacious in paediatric patients with symptomatic asthma and had comparable safety and tolerability with placebo Respimat®.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01383499.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.