Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25851298›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2015

A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids.

Christian Vogelberg, Petra Moroni-Zentgraf, Migle Leonaviciute-Klimantaviciene, Ralf Sigmund, Eckard Hamelmann, Michael Engel, Stanley Szefler

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01383499 (A Phase II Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Incomplete Crossover Trial With 4-week Treatment Periods to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01383499 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Incomplete Crossover Trial With 4-week Treatment Periods to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution (Doses of 1.25 µg, 2.5 µg and 5 µg) Delivered Via Respimat® Inhaler Once Daily in the Evening in Children 6 to 11 Yrs Old With Moderate Persistent Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2011 to 2012Enrolled101ConditionsAsthmaArmsTiotropium bromide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A comparison of tiotropium, long-acting βRespiratory research · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Preschool children with persistent asthmatic symptoms.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. New Drugs for Pediatric Asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Targeting acetylcholine receptor M3 prevents the progression of airway hyperreactivity in a mouse model of childhood asthma.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Severe Asthma in Children.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian Vogelberg
Petra Moroni-Zentgraf
Migle Leonaviciute-Klimantaviciene
Ralf Sigmund
Eckard Hamelmann
Michael Engel
Stanley Szefler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA considerable number of children with asthma remain symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, resulting in significant morbidity, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare costs and lost school days. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg and 1.25 μg add-on to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a leukotriene modifier, in children aged 6-11 years with symptomatic asthma.

methodsIn this Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, incomplete-crossover, dose-ranging study, patients were randomised to receive three of the four treatments evaluated: once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg or 1.25 μg or placebo Respimat®, in the evening during the 12-week (three × 4-week) treatment period.

resultsIn total, 76, 74, 75 and 76 patients aged 6-11 years received tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, 1.25 μg and placebo Respimat®, respectively. For the primary end point (peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured within 3 hours post-dosing), the adjusted mean responses with tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (272 mL), 2.5 μg (290 mL) and 1.25 μg (261 mL) were significantly greater than with placebo Respimat® (185 mL; p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0011, respectively). The safety and tolerability of all doses of tiotropium Respimat® were comparable with those of placebo Respimat®, with no serious adverse events and no events leading to discontinuation.

conclusionsTiotropium Respimat® add-on to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a leukotriene modifier, was efficacious in paediatric patients with symptomatic asthma and had comparable safety and tolerability with placebo Respimat®.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01383499.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAge FactorsAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsChildCholinergic AntagonistsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLeukotriene AntagonistsLungAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsLeukotriene AntagonistsTiotropium Bromide

Identifiers

PMID25851298
PMCPMC4331449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.