Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25851216›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2015

Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in the elderly.

Maria Teresa Ventura, Nicoletta Cassano, Paolo Romita, Michelangelo Vestita, Caterina Foti, Gino Antonio Vena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Urticaria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  5. Food Allergies and Ageing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Teresa VenturaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, Medical School, Policlinico, Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, Policlinico, piazza G. Cesare, 70124, Bari, Italy, Mariateresa.ventura@uniba.it.
Nicoletta Cassano
Paolo Romita
Michelangelo Vestita
Caterina Foti
Gino Antonio Vena
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAustrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The guidelines for the management of urticaria in adults and children have been revised and updated recently. However, there are few data in the literature concerning several aspects of this disease in the elderly (e.g., epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical aspects, association with co-morbidities, efficacy and safety profiles of treatments, and management strategies). This is an obvious deficiency in the data, as this disease causes a deterioration in quality of life, affecting the quality of sleep, everyday life habits and activities, and inducing severe disability. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can also be associated with internal, infectious, autoimmune, or neoplastic diseases. It is therefore necessary to pay particular attention to these clinical issues through appropriate clinical examinations. At the same time, the specific features of medications used to treat CSU in the elderly should be carefully evaluated, as its pharmacological treatment raises a number of problems related both to the clinical condition of the patient and to concomitant diseases, as well as to the polypharmacotherapy, which is common in older subjects and may cause safety problems because of the drug interactions. Non-sedating new-generation antihistamines are the mainstay treatment of CSU for the elderly. The efficacy and safety of alternative treatment options have not been assessed in the geriatric population with CSU; corticosteroids and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) should be used by this population with extreme caution. Similarly, there are no data regarding the actual safety profile of the new-generation antihistamines at higher doses than those recommended in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedChronic DiseaseCyclosporineHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingHumansUrticariaCyclosporineHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating

Identifiers

PMID25851216
OpenAlexW2046638761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.