Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25850987›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2015

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion meropenem in overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients with stable and unstable kidney function: a step toward dose optimization for the treatment of severe gram-negative bacterial infections.

Manjunath P Pai, Piergiorgio Cojutti, Federico Pea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manjunath P PaiAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA.
Piergiorgio Cojutti
Federico Pea

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeropenem is an anti-Gram-negative antimicrobial, the time-dependent activity of which may be maximized through administration by continuous infusion.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion meropenem in relation to body size and Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) in overweight and obese patients with stable and unstable kidney function with the intent of creating a nomogram for optimal dosing. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients from a single institution with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) receiving meropenem by continuous infusion with measurement of meropenem steady-state concentrations (C ss) were identified. Individual Bayesian estimates of meropenem volume of distribution of the central compartment (V c) and clearance (CL) were calculated and relationships to body size descriptors and CLCR estimated using these body size descriptors were defined by regression. Kidney function stability was defined based on median absolute deviation, stratification by the ratio of maximum to minimum serum creatinine (SCr) and individual patient-level regression of SCr over time. The influence of kidney function stability on meropenem CL estimation by CLCR was tested.

resultsA total of 375 patients (77.9 % male) with 846 C ss values (62.4 % of patients with ≥2 measurements) were identified. The median daily dose of meropenem and frequency of infusion bag changes were 2000 mg/day and four times per day, respectively. The meropenem C ss values were ≥16, ≥8, ≥4, and ≥2 mg/L for 41.1, 76.1, 97.4, and 99.9 % of observations, respectively. The median (range) age, weight, and BMI were 66 (24-90) years, 90 (70-250) kg, and 30.8 (25.1-81.6) kg/m(2), respectively. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] serum creatinine at baseline was 1.57 (1.37) mg/dL. The mean (SD) V c was 28.1 (1.36) L and not related to body size, while CL was 8.85 (6.40) L/h and best related to CLCR estimated using adjusted body weight (ABW). The meropenem CL to CLCR relationship was not significantly impacted by the presence or absence of kidney function stability. The user-friendly dosing nomogram based on CLCR estimated using ABW showed that optimal drug exposure [Css ≥ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] may be obtained even against multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens when considering dosages up to 1250 mg every 6 h by continuous infusion.

conclusionsMeropenem CL is best estimated using CLCR with ABW in patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) and this relationship is not altered by unstable kidney function. Application of our dosing nomogram may improve the care of overweight and obese patients with severe MDR Gram-negative infections treated with meropenem by continuous infusion.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBayes TheoremDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansInfusions, IntravenousKidneyKidney Function TestsMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemThienamycins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.