Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25850631›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2015

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Ferdinando Agresta, Fabio Cesare Campanile, Nereo Vettoretto, Gianfranco Silecchia, Carlo Bergamini, Pietro Maida, Pietro Lombari, Piero Narilli, Domenico Marchi, Alessandro Carrara and 6 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferdinando AgrestaDepartment of Surgery, Presidio Ospedaliero di Adria (RO), Adria, RO, Italy, fagresta@libero.it.
Fabio Cesare Campanile
Nereo Vettoretto
Gianfranco Silecchia
Carlo Bergamini
Pietro Maida
Pietro Lombari
Piero Narilli
Domenico Marchi
Alessandro Carrara
Maria Grazia Esposito
Stefania Fiume
Giuseppe Miranda
Simona Barlera
Marina Davoli
Italian Surgical Societies Working Group
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITPresidio Ospedaliero · ITVilla Pineta Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITNational Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment · USOspedale di Civita Castellana · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Urbino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard technique for gallbladder diseases in both acute and elective surgery. Nevertheless, reports from national surveys still seem to represent some doubts regarding its diffusion. There is neither a wide consensus on its indications nor on its possible related morbidity. On the other hand, more than 25 years have passed since the introduction of LC, and we have all witnessed the exponential growth of knowledge, skill and technology that has followed it. In 1995, the EAES published its consensus statement on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which seven main questions were answered, according to the available evidence. During the following 20 years, there have been several additional guidelines on LC, mainly focused on some particular aspect, such as emergency or concomitant biliary tract surgery.

methodsIn 2012, several Italian surgical societies decided to revisit the clinical recommendations for the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of gallbladder diseases in adults, to update and supplement the existing guidelines with recommendations that reflect what is known and what constitutes good practice concerning LC.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicConsensus Statements as TopicAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresAsymptomatic DiseasesCholecystitisCholelithiasisFemaleGallbladder DiseasesGallstonesHumansLiver CirrhosisPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25850631
OpenAlexW2034376166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.