Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25850433›Full record

Trial reportMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2015

Integrated Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) and Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Identifies Galectin-1 as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Sorafenib Resistance in Liver Cancer.

Chao-Chi Yeh, Chih-Hung Hsu, Yu-Yun Shao, Wen-Ching Ho, Mong-Hsun Tsai, Wen-Chi Feng, Lu-Ping Chow

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circulating galectin-1 delineates response to bevacizumab in melanoma patients and reprograms endothelial cell biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao-Chi YehFrom the ‡Graduate Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Chih-Hung Hsu§Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, ‖Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Yun Shao§Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, ‖Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Ching HoFrom the ‡Graduate Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Mong-Hsun Tsai¶Institute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University and.
Wen-Chi FengFrom the ‡Graduate Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Lu-Ping ChowFrom the ‡Graduate Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, chowip@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorafenib has become the standard therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, most patients eventually develop acquired resistance. Therefore, it is important to identify potential biomarkers that could predict the efficacy of sorafenib. To identify target proteins associated with the development of sorafenib resistance, we applied stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomic approach to analyze differences in protein expression levels between parental HuH-7 and sorafenib-acquired resistance HuH-7 (HuH-7(R)) cells in vitro, combined with an isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) quantitative analysis of HuH-7 and HuH-7(R) tumors in vivo. In total, 2,450 quantified proteins were identified in common in SILAC and iTRAQ experiments, with 81 showing increased expression (>2.0-fold) with sorafenib resistance and 75 showing decreased expression (<0.5-fold). In silico analyses of these differentially expressed proteins predicted that 10 proteins were related to cancer with involvements in cell adhesion, migration, and invasion. Knockdown of one of these candidate proteins, galectin-1, decreased cell proliferation and metastasis in HuH-7(R) cells and restored sensitivity to sorafenib. We verified galectin-1 as a predictive marker of sorafenib resistance and a downstream target of the AKT/mTOR/HIF-1α signaling pathway. In addition, increased galectin-1 expression in HCC patients' serum was associated with poor tumor control and low response rate. We also found that a high serum galectin-1 level was an independent factor associated with poor progression-free survival and overall survival. In conclusion, these results suggest that galectin-1 is a possible biomarker for predicting the response of HCC patients to treatment with sorafenib. As such, it may assist in the stratification of HCC and help direct personalized therapy.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGalectin 1Gene Knockdown TechniquesHumansIsotope LabelingLiver NeoplasmsMice, Inbred BALB CAmino AcidsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorGalectin 1NiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID25850433
PMCPMC4458718
OpenAlexW2209610959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.