ArticleNature biotechnology2015
Silence on the relevant literature and errors in implementation.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell State Transition Models Stratify Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes and Reveal New Therapeutic Targets.Cancers · 2024Article
- Reversing pathological cell states: the road less travelled can extend the therapeutic horizon.Trends in cell biology · 2023Review
- Control of cell state transitions.Nature · 2022Article
- A systematic analysis of signaling reactivation and drug resistance.Cell reports · 2021Article
- Mapping connections in signaling networks with ambiguous modularity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2019Article
- Fitting mathematical models of biochemical pathways to steady state perturbation response data without simulating perturbation experiments.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Experimental noise cutoff boosts inferability of transcriptional networks in large-scale gene-deletion studies.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Netter: re-ranking gene network inference predictions using structural network properties.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Response to letter of correspondence - Bastiaens et al.Nature biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25850052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.