Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25849964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Evaluation and validation of housekeeping genes as reference for gene expression studies in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under drought stress conditions.

Pallavi Sinha, Vikas K Singh, V Suryanarayana, L Krishnamurthy, Rachit K Saxena, Rajeev K Varshney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic characterization of ZIP genes in pigeonpea (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Identification and validation of reference genes for qRT-PCR based studies in horse gram (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomics-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pallavi SinhaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India.
Vikas K SinghInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India.
V SuryanarayanaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India.
L KrishnamurthyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India.
Rachit K SaxenaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, India; School of Plant Biology and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression analysis using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is a very sensitive technique and its sensitivity depends on the stable performance of reference gene(s) used in the study. A number of housekeeping genes have been used in various expression studies in many crops however, their expression were found to be inconsistent under different stress conditions. As a result, species specific housekeeping genes have been recommended for different expression studies in several crop species. However, such specific housekeeping genes have not been reported in the case of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) despite the fact that genome sequence has become available for the crop. To identify the stable housekeeping genes in pigeonpea for expression analysis under drought stress conditions, the relative expression variations of 10 commonly used housekeeping genes (EF1α, UBQ10, GAPDH, 18SrRNA, 25SrRNA, TUB6, ACT1, IF4α, UBC and HSP90) were studied on root, stem and leaves tissues of Asha (ICPL 87119). Three statistical algorithms geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper were used to define the stability of candidate genes. geNorm analysis identified IF4α and TUB6 as the most stable housekeeping genes however, NormFinder analysis determined IF4α and HSP90 as the most stable housekeeping genes under drought stress conditions. Subsequently validation of the identified candidate genes was undertaken in qRT-PCR based gene expression analysis of uspA gene which plays an important role for drought stress conditions in pigeonpea. The relative quantification of the uspA gene varied according to the internal controls (stable and least stable genes), thus highlighting the importance of the choice of as well as validation of internal controls in such experiments. The identified stable and validated housekeeping genes will facilitate gene expression studies in pigeonpea especially under drought stress conditions.

Indexed as

DroughtsAlgorithmsCajanusGene Expression ProfilingGenes, EssentialGenes, PlantReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID25849964
PMCPMC4388706
OpenAlexW2086241843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.