Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25849959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Assessing species boundaries using multilocus species delimitation in a morphologically conserved group of neotropical freshwater fishes, the Poecilia sphenops species complex (Poeciliidae).

Justin C Bagley, Fernando Alda, M Florencia Breitman, Eldredge Bermingham, Eric P van den Berghe, Jerald B Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A multilocus phylogeny of the fish genusEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ZooKeys · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The imperiled fish fauna in the Nicaragua Canal zone.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Justin C BagleyEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, United States of America.
Fernando AldaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá
M Florencia BreitmanEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, United States of America; Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT-CONICET), U9120ACD, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.
Eldredge BerminghamSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá
Eric P van den BergheCentro Zamorano de Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ambiente y Desarrollo, Zamorano University, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Jerald B JohnsonEvolutionary Ecology Laboratories, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, United States of America; Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, United States of America.
Brigham Young University · USSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PACentro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico · ARZamorano Pan-American Agricultural School · HN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately delimiting species is fundamentally important for understanding species diversity and distributions and devising effective strategies to conserve biodiversity. However, species delimitation is problematic in many taxa, including 'non-adaptive radiations' containing morphologically cryptic lineages. Fortunately, coalescent-based species delimitation methods hold promise for objectively estimating species limits in such radiations, using multilocus genetic data. Using coalescent-based approaches, we delimit species and infer evolutionary relationships in a morphologically conserved group of Central American freshwater fishes, the Poecilia sphenops species complex. Phylogenetic analyses of multiple genetic markers (sequences of two mitochondrial DNA genes and five nuclear loci) from 10/15 species and genetic lineages recognized in the group support the P. sphenops species complex as monophyletic with respect to outgroups, with eight mitochondrial 'major-lineages' diverged by ≥2% pairwise genetic distances. From general mixed Yule-coalescent models, we discovered (conservatively) 10 species within our concatenated mitochondrial DNA dataset, 9 of which were strongly supported by subsequent multilocus Bayesian species delimitation and species tree analyses. Results suggested species-level diversity is underestimated or overestimated by at least ~15% in different lineages in the complex. Nonparametric statistics and coalescent simulations indicate genealogical discordance among our gene tree results has mainly derived from interspecific hybridization in the nuclear genome. However, mitochondrial DNA show little evidence for introgression, and our species delimitation results appear robust to effects of this process. Overall, our findings support the utility of combining multiple lines of genetic evidence and broad phylogeographical sampling to discover and validate species using coalescent-based methods. Our study also highlights the importance of testing for hybridization versus incomplete lineage sorting, which aids inference of not only species limits but also evolutionary processes influencing genetic diversity.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBayes TheoremBiodiversityDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularFresh WaterPhylogeographyPoeciliaDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID25849959
PMCPMC4388586
OpenAlexW2043069421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.