Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25849623›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Social functioning trajectories of young first-episode psychosis patients with and without cannabis misuse: a 30-month follow-up study.

César González-Blanch, John F Gleeson, Peter Koval, Sue M Cotton, Patrick D McGorry, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. The relationship between substance use and self-reported aspects of social functioning in patients with a psychotic disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

César González-BlanchMental Health Centre, University Hospital "Marqués de Valdecilla", Santander, Spain.
John F GleesonSchool of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter KovalSchool of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sue M CottonCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre. Melbourne, Australia.
Patrick D McGorryCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre. Melbourne, Australia.
Mario Alvarez-JimenezCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre. Melbourne, Australia.
Orygen Youth Health · AUAustralian Catholic University · AUKU Leuven · BEMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate trajectories of social functioning in young people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) with and without cannabis misuse using a secondary analysis of data from the Episode-II trial. Forty-two young people with FEP and comorbid cannabis use disorder were compared with 39 young people with FEP but without a cannabis use disorder. Social functioning was assessed every 6 months during a 30-month follow-up. Multilevel linear growth curve modeling was used to compare the social functioning trajectories over time for those with and without cannabis misuse. Cannabis misuse was not associated with social functioning at baseline assessment. Over a 30-month follow-up, FEP patients without cannabis disorder showed significant improvements in their social functioning, whereas patients with cannabis misuse at baseline displayed no such improvement. Patients with and without cannabis misuse differed significantly in their levels of social functioning after 24 months. Similar results were obtained after adjusting for potential confounders (i.e., age, gender, negative symptoms, premorbid functioning, DSM-IV diagnoses, baseline social functioning and other substance use). In the context of a specialized early intervention service, patients with cannabis misuse at baseline did not attain the improvements in social outcomes observed in their counterparts without cannabis misuse. There is a need to develop effective interventions to reduce cannabis misuse to ultimately improve social outcomes in young people with psychosis.

Indexed as

Social SkillsAdolescentAdultCannabisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25849623
PMCPMC4388449
OpenAlexW1992103633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.