Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25849388›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2015

Radiation decay of thaumatin crystals at three X-ray energies.

Dorothee Liebschner, Gerold Rosenbaum, Miroslawa Dauter, Zbigniew Dauter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Separating the effects of temperature and absorbed X-ray dose on unit-cell volume.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Damage-limited resolution for X-ray and electron microscopy of organic specimens.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Variability in X-ray induced effects in [Rh(COD)Cl]Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The hidden treasure in your data: phasing with unexpected weak anomalous scatterers from routine data sets.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. RNA protects a nucleoprotein complex against radiation damage.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  16. Objective evaluation of radiation damage in a nucleoprotein complex.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dorothee LiebschnerStructural Biology Research Center, Photon Factory, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan.
Gerold RosenbaumDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Georgia and Structural Biology Center, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.
Miroslawa DauterLeidos Biomedical Research Inc., Basic Science Program, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.
Zbigniew DauterSynchrotron Radiation Research Section, MCL, National Cancer Institute, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.

Funding

Macromolecular Crystallography Research with Synchrotron RadiationZIABC010378 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DAUTER, ZBIGNIEW · 2009 to 2020
$18.8M
Intramural NIH HHSPHS HHS HHSN261200800E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation damage is an unavoidable obstacle in X-ray crystallographic data collection for macromolecular structure determination, so it is important to know how much radiation a sample can endure before being degraded beyond an acceptable limit. In the literature, the threshold at which the average intensity of all recorded reflections decreases to a certain fraction of the initial value is called the `dose limit'. The first estimated D50 dose-limit value, at which the average diffracted intensity was reduced to 50%, was 20 MGy and was derived from observing sample decay in electron-diffraction experiments. A later X-ray study carried out at 100 K on ferritin protein crystals arrived at a D50 of 43 MGy, and recommended an intensity reduction of protein reflections to 70%, D70, corresponding to an absorbed dose of 30 MGy, as a more appropriate limit for macromolecular crystallography. In the macromolecular crystallography community, the rate of intensity decay with dose was then assumed to be similar for all protein crystals. A series of diffraction images of cryocooled (100 K) thaumatin crystals at identical small, 2° rotation intervals were recorded at X-ray energies of 6.33 , 12.66 and 19.00 keV. Five crystals were used for each wavelength. The decay in the average diffraction intensity to 70% of the initial value, for data extending to 2.45 Å resolution, was determined to be about 7.5 MGy at 6.33 keV and about 11 MGy at the two higher energies.

Indexed as

CrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayPlant ProteinsPlantsPlant Proteinsthaumatin protein, plantdose limitenergy dependenceradiation damage

Identifiers

PMID25849388
PMCPMC4388262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.