Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848761›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Postnatal depression among rural women in South India: do socio-demographic, obstetric and pregnancy outcome have a role to play?

Siddharudha Shivalli, Nandihal Gururaj

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Postpartum depression in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siddharudha ShivalliDepartment of Community Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nandihal GururajDepartment of Community Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Yenepoya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostnatal depression (PND) is one of the most common psychopathology and is considered as a serious public health issue because of its devastating effects on mother, family, and infant or the child.

objectiveTo elicit socio-demographic, obstetric and pregnancy outcome predictors of Postnatal Depression (PND) among rural postnatal women in Karnataka state, India.

designHospital based analytical cross sectional study.

settingA rural tertiary care hospital of Mandya District, Karnataka state, India. SAMPLE: PND prevalence based estimated sample of 102 women who came for postnatal follow up from 4th to 10th week of lactation.

methodStudy participants were interviewed using validated kannada version of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Cut-off score of ≥ 13 was used as high risk of PND. The percentage of women at risk of PND was estimated, and differences according to socio-demographic, obstetric and pregnancy outcome were described. Logistic regression was applied to identify the independent predictors of PND risk.

main outcome measuresPrevalence, Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted (adj) OR of PND.

resultsPrevalence of PND was 31.4% (95% CI 22.7-41.4%). PND showed significant (P < 0.05) association with joint family, working women, non-farmer husbands, poverty, female baby and pregnancy complications or known medical illness. In binomial logistic regression poverty (adjOR: 11.95, 95% CI:1.36-105), birth of female baby (adjOR: 3.6, 95% CI:1.26-10.23) and pregnancy complications or known medical illness (adjOR: 17.4, 95% CI:2.5-121.2) remained as independent predictors of PND.

conclusionRisk of PND among rural postnatal women was high (31.4%). Birth of female baby, poverty and complications in pregnancy or known medical illness could predict the high risk of PND. PND screening should be an integral part of postnatal care. Capacity building of grass root level workers and feasibility trials for screening PND by them are needed.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricDepression, PostpartumPregnancy OutcomeRural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25848761
PMCPMC4388688
OpenAlexW2136301328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.