Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848751›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2015

Mutational landscape and clonal architecture in grade II and III gliomas.

Hiromichi Suzuki, Kosuke Aoki, Kenichi Chiba, Yusuke Sato, Yusuke Shiozawa, Yuichi Shiraishi, Teppei Shimamura, Atsushi Niida, Kazuya Motomura, Fumiharu Ohka and 21 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 486 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
486citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

486 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Molecular features in gangliogliomas: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Clinical Efficacy of Olaparib inJCO precision oncology · 2021
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

426 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Hiromichi Suzuki1] Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. [2] Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kosuke Aoki1] Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. [2] Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenichi ChibaHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke SatoDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke ShiozawaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuichi ShiraishiHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Teppei ShimamuraDivision of Systems Biology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Atsushi NiidaHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuya MotomuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Fumiharu Ohka1] Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. [2] Department of Epigenomics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kuniaki TanahashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Melissa RanjitDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshihiko WakabayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tetsuichi YoshizatoDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Keisuke KataokaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenichi YoshidaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasunobu NagataDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Aiko Sato-OtsuboDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroko TanakaHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi SanadaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yutaka KondoDepartment of Epigenomics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideo NakamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masahiro MizoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tatsuya AbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Yoshihiro MuragakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Reiko WatanabeDivision of Clinical Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ichiro ItoDivision of Clinical Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Satoru MiyanoHuman Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi NatsumeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Seishi OgawaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grade II and III gliomas are generally slowly progressing brain cancers, many of which eventually transform into more aggressive tumors. Despite recent findings of frequent mutations in IDH1 and other genes, knowledge about their pathogenesis is still incomplete. Here, combining two large sets of high-throughput sequencing data, we delineate the entire picture of genetic alterations and affected pathways in these glioma types, with sensitive detection of driver genes. Grade II and III gliomas comprise three distinct subtypes characterized by discrete sets of mutations and distinct clinical behaviors. Mutations showed significant positive and negative correlations and a chronological hierarchy, as inferred from different allelic burdens among coexisting mutations, suggesting that there is functional interplay between the mutations that drive clonal selection. Extensive serial and multi-regional sampling analyses further supported this finding and also identified a high degree of temporal and spatial heterogeneity generated during tumor expansion and relapse, which is likely shaped by the complex but ordered processes of multiple clonal selection and evolutionary events.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGene FrequencyGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGliomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMutationNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID25848751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.