ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2014
Sustainability considerations for health research and analytic data infrastructures.
Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technology-enabled collaborative care management of depression in urban and rural cancer centers: Protocol and baseline results from the SCOPE pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- The Common Fund Data Ecosystem (CFDE).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies-a large-scale centralized reference ontology for international data harmonization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Gathering speed and countering tensions in the rapid learning health system.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- The Evolve to Next-Gen ACT Network: An evolving open-access, real-world data resource primed for real-world evidence research across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Partnership Sustainability in the United States.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021Article
- The grant is dead, long live the data - migration as a pragmatic exit strategy for research data preservation.Wellcome open research · 2019Article
- Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- "Minimally invasive research?" Use of the electronic health record to facilitate research in pediatric urology.Journal of pediatric urology · 2018Review
- Clinical Research Informatics for Big Data and Precision Medicine.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Implementing partnership-driven clinical federated electronic health record data sharing networks.International journal of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Facilitating biomedical researchers' interrogation of electronic health record data: Ideas from outside of biomedical informatics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Review
- A Framework to Support the Sharing and Reuse of Computable Phenotype Definitions Across Health Care Delivery and Clinical Research Applications.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2016Article
- A Digital Architecture for a Network-Based Learning Health System: Integrating Chronic Care Management, Quality Improvement, and Research.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2015Article
- Research Data Explorer: Lessons Learned in Design and Development of Context-based Cohort Definition and Selection.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe United States has made recent large investments in creating data infrastructures to support the important goals of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and comparative effectiveness research (CER), with still more investment planned. These initial investments, while critical to the creation of the infrastructures, are not expected to sustain them much beyond the initial development. To provide the maximum benefit, the infrastructures need to be sustained through innovative financing models while providing value to PCOR and CER researchers. SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS: Based on our experience with creating flexible sustainability strategies (i.e., strategies that are adaptive to the different characteristics and opportunities of a resource or infrastructure), we define specific factors that are important considerations in developing a sustainability strategy. These factors include assets, expansion, complexity, and stakeholders. Each factor is described, with examples of how it is applied. These factors are dimensions of variation in different resources, to which a sustainability strategy should adapt. SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS: We also identify specific important considerations for maintaining an infrastructure, so that the long-term intended benefits can be realized. These observations are presented as lessons learned, to be applied to other sustainability efforts. We define the lessons learned, relating them to the defined sustainability factors as interactions between factors. CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS: Using perspectives and experiences from a diverse group of experts, we define broad characteristics of sustainability strategies and important observations, which can vary for different projects. Other descriptions of adaptive, flexible, and successful models of collaboration between stakeholders and data infrastructures can expand this framework by identifying other factors for sustainability, and give more concrete directions on how sustainability can be best achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.