Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848605›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2014

Sustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research Network.

John F Steiner, Andrea R Paolino, Ella E Thompson, Eric B Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John F SteinerKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research.
Andrea R PaolinoKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research.
Ella E ThompsonGroup Health Research Institute.
Eric B LarsonGroup Health Research Institute.

Funding

Multi-institutional Consortium for CER in Diabetes Treatment and PreventionR01HS019859 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STEINER, JOHN F · 2010 to 2010
$8.9M
AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum for Comparative Effectiveness RU13HS019564 · AHRQ · ACADEMYHEALTH · PI HOLVE, ERIN C · 2010 to 2010
$3.9M
SUPREME-DM: Sustaining a Learning Research NetworkR01HS022963 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STEINER, JOHN F · 2013 to 2013
$749k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019859AHRQ HHS R01 HS022963AHRQ HHS U13 HS019564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs multi-institutional research networks assume a central role in clinical research, they must address the challenge of sustainability. Despite its importance, the concept of network sustainability has received little attention in the literature, and the sustainability strategies of durable scientific networks have not been described. INNOVATION: The Health Maintenance Organization Research Network (HMORN) is a consortium of 18 research departments in integrated health care delivery systems with over 15 million members in the United States and Israel. The HMORN has coordinated federally funded scientific networks and studies since 1994. This case study describes the HMORN approach to sustainability, proposes an operational definition of network sustainability, and identifies 10 essential elements that can enhance sustainability. CREDIBILITY: The sustainability framework proposed here is drawn from prior publications on organizational issues by HMORN investigators and from the experience of recent HMORN leaders and senior staff. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Network sustainability can be defined as (1) the development and enhancement of shared research assets to facilitate a sequence of research studies in a specific content area or multiple areas, and (2) a community of researchers and other stakeholders who reuse and develop those assets. Essential elements needed to develop the shared assets of a network include: network governance; trustworthy data and processes for sharing data; shared knowledge about research tools; administrative efficiency; physical infrastructure; and infrastructure funding. The community of researchers within a network is enhanced by: a clearly defined mission, vision and values; protection of human subjects; a culture of collaboration; and strong relationships with host organizations. While the importance of these elements varies based on the membership and goals of a network, this framework for sustainability can enhance strategic planning within the network and can guide relationships with external stakeholders.

Identifiers

PMID25848605
PMCPMC4371441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.