Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848532›Full record

ReviewBoneKEy reports2015

Molecular alterations that drive breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Penelope D Ottewell, Liam O'Donnell, Ingunn Holen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BoneKEy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review old bone, new tricks.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer Cell Colonisation in the Bone Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Penelope D OttewellAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Medical School, University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK.
Liam O'DonnellAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Medical School, University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK.
Ingunn HolenAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Medical School, University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial cancers including breast and prostate commonly progress to form incurable bone metastases. For this to occur, cancer cells must adapt their phenotype and behaviour to enable detachment from the primary tumour, invasion into the vasculature, and homing to and subsequent colonisation of bone. It is widely accepted that the metastatic process is driven by the transformation of cancer cells from a sessile epithelial to a motile mesenchymal phenotype through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Dissemination of these motile cells into the circulation provides the conduit for cells to metastasise to distant organs. However, accumulating evidence suggests that EMT is not sufficient for metastasis to occur and that specific tissue-homing factors are required for tumour cells to lodge and grow in bone. Once tumour cells are disseminated in the bone environment, they can revert into an epithelial phenotype through the reverse process of mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) and form secondary tumours. In this review, we describe the molecular alterations undertaken by breast cancer cells at each stage of the metastatic cascade and discuss how these changes facilitate bone metastasis.

Identifiers

PMID25848532
PMCPMC4371414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.