Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848513›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2013

Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens.

Parisa Badiee, Amir Arastefar, Hadis Jafarian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The prevalence of pediatric nosocomial fungal infections.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sinonasal Mucormycosis: A to Z.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parisa BadieeProfessor Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amir ArastefarProfessor Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hadis JafarianProfessor Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare direct microscopic examination with culture and PCR for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection in blood and tissue specimens. MATERIAL AND

methodsBlood samples and tissue specimens were obtained from 28 patients (total 58 samples) with suspected invasive fungal infection and cultured on proper media. Direct smear of tissue samples was done with potassium hydroxide, hematoxylin and eosin, and methenamine silver staining. DNA extracted from blood and tissue specimens were used for semi-nested PCR targeting 18S rDNA of Mucorales species.

resultsMucormycosis was documented in 7/28 (25%) of tissue specimens with positive findings by direct smear, of which PCR and culture were positive in 6 (86%) and 5 (70%) specimens, respectively. The etiologic agents were Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. However, culture and PCR results for all blood specimens were negative.

conclusionsAs the orders of Mucorales do not have well growth in culture media, PCR with tissue specimens is more sensitive than tissue or blood culture methods. Unfortunately, there is no alternative method for direct smear, which is an invasive method. Molecular methods may be helpful in these cases.

Indexed as

18S rDNAInvasive fungal infectionMucoraceaSemi-nested PCR

Identifiers

PMID25848513
PMCPMC4385169
OpenAlexW2149320900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.