Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848415›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2015

Successful physician training program for large scale EMR implementation.

J L Pantaleoni, L A Stevens, E S Mailes, B A Goad, C A Longhurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Association between evidence-based training and clinician proficiency in electronic health record use.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J L PantaleoniDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California ; Department of Clinical Informatics, Stanford Children's Health , Palo Alto, California.
L A StevensDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California ; Department of Clinical Informatics, Stanford Children's Health , Palo Alto, California.
E S MailesDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Stanford Children's Health , Palo Alto, California.
B A GoadDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Stanford Children's Health , Palo Alto, California.
C A LonghurstDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California ; Department of Clinical Informatics, Stanford Children's Health , Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-user training is an essential element of electronic medical record (EMR) implementation and frequently suffers from minimal institutional investment. In addition, discussion of successful EMR training programs for physicians is limited in the literature. The authors describe a successful physician-training program at Stanford Children's Health as part of a large scale EMR implementation. Evaluations of classroom training, obtained at the conclusion of each class, revealed high physician satisfaction with the program. Free-text comments from learners focused on duration and timing of training, the learning environment, quality of the instructors, and specificity of training to their role or department. Based upon participant feedback and institutional experience, best practice recommendations, including physician engagement, curricular design, and assessment of proficiency and recognition, are suggested for future provider EMR training programs. The authors strongly recommend the creation of coursework to group providers by common workflow.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEducation, Medicaleducationelectronic medical recordsPhysician

Identifiers

PMID25848415
PMCPMC4377562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.