Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848411›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2015

Emergency medicine resident physicians' perceptions of electronic documentation and workflow: a mixed methods study.

P M Neri, L Redden, S Poole, C N Pozner, J Horsky, A S Raja, E Poon, G Schiff, A Landman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. A Practical Approach for Monitoring the Use of Copy-Paste in Clinical Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Documentation Displaces Teaching in an Academic Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P M NeriClinical & Quality Analysis , Partners HealthCare System, Wellesley, MA.
L ReddenClinical & Quality Analysis , Partners HealthCare System, Wellesley, MA.
S PooleBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Neil and Elise Wallace STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation ; Simulation Consulting , Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
C N PoznerBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Neil and Elise Wallace STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation ; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA.
J HorskyBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA.
A S RajaBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA.
E PoonBoston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, MA.
G SchiffBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA.
A LandmanBrigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand emergency department (ED) physicians' use of electronic documentation in order to identify usability and workflow considerations for the design of future ED information system (EDIS) physician documentation modules.

methodsWe invited emergency medicine resident physicians to participate in a mixed methods study using task analysis and qualitative interviews. Participants completed a simulated, standardized patient encounter in a medical simulation center while documenting in the test environment of a currently used EDIS. We recorded the time on task, type and sequence of tasks performed by the participants (including tasks performed in parallel). We then conducted semi-structured interviews with each participant. We analyzed these qualitative data using the constant comparative method to generate themes.

resultsEight resident physicians participated. The simulation session averaged 17 minutes and participants spent 11 minutes on average on tasks that included electronic documentation. Participants performed tasks in parallel, such as history taking and electronic documentation. Five of the 8 participants performed a similar workflow sequence during the first part of the session while the remaining three used different workflows. Three themes characterize electronic documentation: (1) physicians report that location and timing of documentation varies based on patient acuity and workload, (2) physicians report a need for features that support improved efficiency; and (3) physicians like viewing available patient data but struggle with integration of the EDIS with other information sources.

conclusionWe confirmed that physicians spend much of their time on documentation (65%) during an ED patient visit. Further, we found that resident physicians did not all use the same workflow and approach even when presented with an identical standardized patient scenario. Future EHR design should consider these varied workflows while trying to optimize efficiency, such as improving integration of clinical data. These findings should be tested quantitatively in a larger, representative study.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInternship and ResidencyPhysiciansWorkflowDocumentationEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime Factorselectronic documentationelectronic health recordsemergency departmentWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID25848411
PMCPMC4377558
OpenAlexW1960438578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.