Observational studyClinical interventions in aging2015
Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study.
Observational study in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vertebral trabecular microarchitecture changes in the normally ageing population.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Risk of Revision After Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Narrative Review.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Risk factors of postoperative bone cement leakage on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Potential underdiagnosis of osteoporosis in repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures.Clinical interventions in aging · 2015Article
- Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study--how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?Clinical interventions in aging · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthors' reply.2015
- Commented on byAuthors' reply.2015
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostvertebral augmentation vertebral compression fractures are common; repeated vertebral augmentation is usually performed for prompt pain relief. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of repeat vertebral augmentation.
methodsWe performed a retrospective, nationwide, population-based longitudinal observation study, using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. All patients who received vertebral augmentation for vertebral compression fractures were evaluated. The collected data included patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, and medication exposure) and repeat vertebral augmentation. Kaplan-Meier and stratified Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed for analyses.
resultsThe overall incidence of repeat vertebral augmentation was 11.3% during the follow-up until 2010. Patients with the following characteristics were at greater risk for repeat vertebral augmentation: female sex (AOR=1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.36), advanced age (AOR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.32-2.08), diabetes mellitus (AOR=4.31; 95% CI: 4.05-5.88), cerebrovascular disease (AOR=4.09; 95% CI: 3.44-5.76), dementia (AOR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.69-2.33), blindness or low vision (AOR=3.72; 95% CI: 2.32-3.95), hypertension (AOR=2.58; 95% CI: 2.35-3.47), and hyperlipidemia (AOR=2.09; 95% CI: 1.67-2.22). Patients taking calcium/vitamin D (AOR=2.98; 95% CI: 1.83-3.93), bisphosphonates (AOR=2.11; 95% CI: 1.26-2.61), or calcitonin (AOR=4.59; 95% CI: 3.40-5.77) were less likely to undergo repeat vertebral augmentation; however, those taking steroids (AOR=7.28; 95% CI: 6.32-8.08), acetaminophen (AOR=3.54; 95% CI: 2.75-4.83), or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (AOR=6.14; 95% CI: 5.08-7.41) were more likely to undergo repeat vertebral augmentation.
conclusionWe conclude that the incidence of repeat vertebral augmentation is rather high. An understanding of risk factors predicting repeat vertebral augmentation provides valuable basis to improve health care for geriatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.