Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848189›Full record

Observational studyJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Megan Loring, Stephanie N Morris, Keith B Isaacson

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Trends of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Five Years of Experience.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Outcome.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Complication Rate of Laparoscopic Hysterectomies in Denmark, 2011-2016.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan LoringCenter for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
Stephanie N MorrisCenter for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
Keith B IsaacsonCenter for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
Newton Wellesley Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDespite the prevalence of hysterectomy for treatment of benign gynecologic conditions, providers nationwide have been slow to adopt minimally-invasive surgical techniques. Our objective is to investigate the impact of a department for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) on the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy at an academic community hospital without robotic technology.

methodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2012. The primary outcome was route of hysterectomy: open, laparoscopic, or vaginal. Secondary outcomes of interest included length of stay and factors associated with an open procedure.

resultsIn 2004, only 24 (8%) of the 292 hysterectomies performed for benign conditions at Newton-Wellesley Hospital (NWH) were laparoscopic. The rate increased to more than 50% (189/365) by 2008, and, in 2012, 72% (316/439) of hysterectomies were performed via a traditional laparoscopic approach. By 2012, more than 93% (411/439) of all hysterectomies were performed in a minimally invasive manner (including total laparoscopic hysterectomy [TLH], laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy [LSH], total vaginal hysterectomy [TVH], and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [LAVH]). More than 85% of the hysterectomies at NWH in 2012 were outpatient procedures. By this time, the surgeon's preference or lack of expertise was rarely cited as a factor leading to open hysterectomy.

conclusionsA large diverse gynecologic surgery department transformed surgical practice from primarily open hysterectomy to a majority (>72%) performed via the traditional laparoscopic route and a large majority (>93%) performed in a minimally invasive manner in less than 8 years, without the use of robotic technology. This paradigm shift was fueled by patient demand and by MIGS department surgical mentorship for generalist obstetrician/gynecologists.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansHysterectomyLaparoscopyMassachusettsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpecializationSurgery Department, HospitalUterine DiseasesBenign hysterectomyLaparoscopic hysterectomyMinimally-invasiveSurgical mentorship

Identifiers

PMID25848189
PMCPMC4376222
OpenAlexW2313880922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.