Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848178›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Telephone follow-up by a midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of face-to-face clinic visit.

Dan Eisenberg, Kimberly Hwa, Sherry M Wren

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03304509 (Comparative Study Between Conventional and Telematic Follow-up of Patient Treated in a General Ang GI Surgery Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03304509 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Study Between Conventional and Telematic Follow-up of Patient Treated in a General Ang GI Surgery Department (TLM-CGD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGermans Trias i Pujol HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled200ConditionsTelemedicine, General Surgery, OutpatientsArmsTelematic follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrospective analysis of open preperitoneal mesh repair of complex inguinal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Survey of patients regarding experience following repair of inguinal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan EisenbergDepartment of Surgery, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kimberly HwaDepartment of Surgery, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sherry M WrenDepartment of Surgery, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe need for more cost- and time-efficient provision of medical care has prompted an interest in remote or telehealth approaches to delivery of health care. We present a study examining the feasibility and outcomes of implementation of a telephone follow-up program for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who prospectively agreed to undergo telephone follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of standard face-to-face clinic visits. Patients received a telephone call from a dedicated physician assistant 2 to 3 weeks after surgery and answered a predetermined questionnaire. A face-to-face clinic visit was scheduled based on the results of the call or on patient request.

resultsOf 62 patients who underwent surgery, all agreed to telephone follow-up instead of face-to-face clinic visits. Their mean round-trip distance to the hospital was 122 miles. Fifty-five patients (88.7%) successfully completed planned telephone follow-up. Three patients (4.8%) were lost to follow-up, and 4 (6.5%) were erroneously scheduled for a clinic appointment. Of the 55 patients who were reached by telephone, 50 (90.9%) were satisfied and declined an in-person clinic visit. Five patients (9.1%) returned for a clinic appointment based on concerns raised during the telephone call. Of these, 1 was found to have an early hernia recurrence and 1 had a seroma.

conclusionTelephone follow-up by a midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is feasible and effective and is well received by patients.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyTelemedicineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, InguinalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneFollow-upInguinal herniaLaparoscopyTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID25848178
PMCPMC4370039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.