Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848039›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells.

Peng Li, Zhangming Mao, Zhangli Peng, Lanlan Zhou, Yuchao Chen, Po-Hsun Huang, Cristina I Truica, Joseph J Drabick, Wafik S El-Deiry, Ming Dao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 248 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
248citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

248 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Acoustofluidic Biosensors.Micromachines · 2026
    Review
  8. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  9. Reconfigurable Acoustofluidic Microvortices for Selective Microcargo Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

188 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peng LiDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
Zhangming MaoDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
Zhangli PengDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556;
Lanlan ZhouDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA 17033; and.
Yuchao ChenDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
Po-Hsun HuangDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
Cristina I TruicaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA 17033; and.
Joseph J DrabickDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA 17033; and.
Wafik S El-DeiryDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA 17033; and.
Ming DaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; mingdao@mit.edu suresh@cmu.edu junhuang@psu.edu.
Subra SureshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 mingdao@mit.edu suresh@cmu.edu junhuang@psu.edu.
Tony Jun HuangDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; mingdao@mit.edu suresh@cmu.edu junhuang@psu.edu.

Funding

Multiscale Modeling of Sickle Cell Anemia: Methods and ValidationU01HL114476 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DAO, MING, HIGGINS, JOHN MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$3.9M
On-Chip Optofluidic Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope for Early Cancer DetectionDP2OD007209 · OD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HUANG, TONY JUN · 2010 to 2010
$2.2M
Standing Surface Acoustic Wave Based Cell Sorters for Maintaining Cell IntegrityR01GM112048 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HUANG, TONY JUN · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
Validation of acoustic tweezers for single-cell analyses of purine metabolismR33EB019785 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HUANG, TONY JUN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
Immunopheonotyping of circulating tumor cellsR21CA181419 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI EL-DEIRY, WAFIK S. · 2014 to 2015
$403k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA181419NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL114476NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL114476NIBIB NIH HHS 1R33EB019785-01NIBIB NIH HHS R33 EB019785NIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM112048-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112048NIH HHS DP2 OD007209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are important targets for cancer biology studies. To further elucidate the role of CTCs in cancer metastasis and prognosis, effective methods for isolating extremely rare tumor cells from peripheral blood must be developed. Acoustic-based methods, which are known to preserve the integrity, functionality, and viability of biological cells using label-free and contact-free sorting, have thus far not been successfully developed to isolate rare CTCs using clinical samples from cancer patients owing to technical constraints, insufficient throughput, and lack of long-term device stability. In this work, we demonstrate the development of an acoustic-based microfluidic device that is capable of high-throughput separation of CTCs from peripheral blood samples obtained from cancer patients. Our method uses tilted-angle standing surface acoustic waves. Parametric numerical simulations were performed to design optimum device geometry, tilt angle, and cell throughput that is more than 20 times higher than previously possible for such devices. We first validated the capability of this device by successfully separating low concentrations (∼100 cells/mL) of a variety of cancer cells from cell culture lines from WBCs with a recovery rate better than 83%. We then demonstrated the isolation of CTCs in blood samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Our acoustic-based separation method thus offers the potential to serve as an invaluable supplemental tool in cancer research, diagnostics, drug efficacy assessment, and therapeutics owing to its excellent biocompatibility, simple design, and label-free automated operation while offering the capability to isolate rare CTCs in a viable state.

Indexed as

AcousticsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SeparationCell SurvivalElectricityFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansNeoplastic Cells, Circulatingacoustic tweezerscell separationcirculating cancer cellsmicrofluidicsrare-cell sorting

Identifiers

PMID25848039
PMCPMC4413297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.