Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848028›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

fMRI of the rod scotoma elucidates cortical rod pathways and implications for lesion measurements.

Brian Barton, Alyssa A Brewer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cortical field maps across human sensory cortex.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid topographic reorganization in adult human primary visual cortex (V1) during noninvasive and reversible deprivation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian BartonDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 bbarton@uci.edu.
Alyssa A BrewerDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-1525
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

NEI NIH HHS L30 EY019249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Are silencing, ectopic shifts, and receptive field (RF) scaling in cortical scotoma projection zones (SPZs) the result of long-term reorganization (plasticity) or short-term adaptation? Electrophysiological studies of SPZs after retinal lesions in animal models remain controversial, because they are unable to conclusively answer this question because of limitations of the methodology. Here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) visual field mapping through population RF (pRF) modeling with moving bar stimuli under photopic and scotopic conditions to measure the effects of the rod scotoma in human early visual cortex. As a naturally occurring central scotoma, it has a large cortical representation, is free of traumatic lesion complications, is completely reversible, and has not reorganized under normal conditions (but can as seen in rod monochromats). We found that the pRFs overlapping the SPZ in V1, V2, V3, hV4, and VO-1 generally (i) reduced their blood oxygen level-dependent signal coherence and (ii) shifted their pRFs more eccentric but (iii) scaled their pRF sizes in variable ways. Thus, silencing, ectopic shifts, and pRF scaling in SPZs are not unique identifiers of cortical reorganization; rather, they can be the expected result of short-term adaptation. However, are there differences between rod and cone signals in V1, V2, V3, hV4, and VO-1? We did not find differences for all five maps in more peripheral eccentricities outside of rod scotoma influence in coherence, eccentricity representation, or pRF size. Thus, rod and cone signals seem to be processed similarly in cortex.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultColor VisionFemaleHumansMaleRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsScotomaVisual CortexVisual FieldsYoung Adultadaptationfunctional MRIplasticitypopulation receptive fieldsscotopic

Identifiers

PMID25848028
PMCPMC4413354
OpenAlexW2033219079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.