Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25848015›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

High-yield hydrogen production from biomass by in vitro metabolic engineering: Mixed sugars coutilization and kinetic modeling.

Joseph A Rollin, Julia Martin del Campo, Suwan Myung, Fangfang Sun, Chun You, Allison Bakovic, Roberto Castro, Sanjeev K Chandrayan, Chang-Hao Wu, Michael W W Adams and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biosynthesis of Raffinose and Stachyose from Sucrose via anApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph A RollinDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Cell-Free Bioinnovations, Blacksburg, VA 24060;
Julia Martin del CampoDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061;
Suwan MyungDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061;
Fangfang SunCell-Free Bioinnovations, Blacksburg, VA 24060;
Chun YouDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Cell-Free Bioinnovations, Blacksburg, VA 24060;
Allison BakovicDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Milwaukee, WI 53202;
Roberto CastroDepartment of Chemical and Natural Gas Engineering, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, TX 78363;
Sanjeev K ChandrayanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Chang-Hao WuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Michael W W AdamsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; Department of Energy BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; and.
Ryan S SengerDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061;
Y-H Percival ZhangDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Cell-Free Bioinnovations, Blacksburg, VA 24060; Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061; Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin 300308, China ypzhang@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · USUniversity of Georgia · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNMilwaukee School of Engineering · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USTexas A&M University – Kingsville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of hydrogen (H2) as a fuel offers enhanced energy conversion efficiency and tremendous potential to decrease greenhouse gas emissions, but producing it in a distributed, carbon-neutral, low-cost manner requires new technologies. Herein we demonstrate the complete conversion of glucose and xylose from plant biomass to H2 and CO2 based on an in vitro synthetic enzymatic pathway. Glucose and xylose were simultaneously converted to H2 with a yield of two H2 per carbon, the maximum possible yield. Parameters of a nonlinear kinetic model were fitted with experimental data using a genetic algorithm, and a global sensitivity analysis was used to identify the enzymes that have the greatest impact on reaction rate and yield. After optimizing enzyme loadings using this model, volumetric H2 productivity was increased 3-fold to 32 mmol H2⋅L(-1)⋅h(-1). The productivity was further enhanced to 54 mmol H2⋅L(-1)⋅h(-1) by increasing reaction temperature, substrate, and enzyme concentrations--an increase of 67-fold compared with the initial studies using this method. The production of hydrogen from locally produced biomass is a promising means to achieve global green energy production.

Indexed as

BiomassCarbohydrate MetabolismModels, TheoreticalCarbon DioxideHydrogenKineticsMetabolic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysReproducibility of ResultsCarbon DioxideHydrogenbiomassglobal sensitivity analysishydrogenin vitro metabolic engineeringmetabolic network modeling

Identifiers

PMID25848015
PMCPMC4413329
OpenAlexW2085079481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.