Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25847776›Full record

SynthesisChinese journal of integrative medicine2016

Wendan decoction (温胆汤) for treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Yi-wen Che, Ke-yu Yao, Yu-peng Xi, Zi-jie Chen, Yong-le Li, Ning Yu, Shuang-qing Zhai

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wendan decoction (Traditional Chinese medicine) for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TheFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-wen CheSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ke-yu YaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yu-peng XiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zi-jie ChenSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yong-le LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ning YuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Shuang-qing ZhaiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. zsq2098@163.com.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the beneficial and adverse effects of Wendan Decoction (温胆汤, WDD) for the treatment of schizophrenia.

methodsFive electronic databases were searched until May 2014, including the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Chinese Scientist Journal Database, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing WDD against placebo, antipsychotic drugs, or WDD combined with antipsychotic drugs against antipsychotic drugs alone were included. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were conducted according to the Cochrane standards.

resultsThirteen RCTs (involving 1,174 patients) were included and the methodological quality was evaluated as generally low. The pooled results showed that WDD combined with antipsychotic drugs were more effective in clinical comprehensive effect, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores compared with antipsychotic drugs alone. However, WDD had less effectiveness compared with antipsychotics in clinical comprehensive effect; and WDD was not different from antipsychotic drugs for PANSS scores. The side effects were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group.

conclusionsWDD appears to be effective on improving symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. However, due to poor methodological quality in the majority of the included trials, the potential benefit from WDD needs to be confirmed in rigorous trials and the design and reporting of trials should follow the international standards.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntipsychotic AgentsBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansPublication BiasSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsDrugs, Chinese Herbalwendanrandomized controlled trialschizophreniasystematic reviewWendan Decoction

Identifiers

PMID25847776
OpenAlexW280099959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.