Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25847732›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2015

Fruit and vegetable consumption and food values: National patterns in the United States by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and cooking frequency.

Julia A Wolfson, Sara N Bleich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Food Access, Dietary Intake, and Nutrition Knowledge of Adults on Probation.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2022
    Article
  12. Cooking at Home, Fast Food, Meat Consumption, and Dietary Carbon Footprint among US Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Indicators of potential health-related social needs and the association with perceived health and well-being outcomes among community-dwelling medicare beneficiaries.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia A WolfsonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jwolfso7@jhu.edu.
Sara N BleichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Racial Disparities in Physician Practice Patterns and Self-Management of ObesityK01HL096409 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BLEICH, SARA NAOMI · 2009 to 2013
$699k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1K01HL096409NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL096409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore frequent cooking at home may help improve diet quality and be associated with food values, particularly for individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

objectiveTo examine patterns of fruit and vegetable consumption and food values among adults (aged 20 and older) in the United States, by SNAP participation and household cooking frequency.

methodsAnalysis of cross-sectional 24-hour dietary recall data obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010 (N=9560).

resultsA lower percentage of SNAP participants consumed fruit (total: 35% vs. 46%, p=0.001; fresh: 30% vs. 41%, p<0.001) and vegetables (total: 49% vs. 58%, p=0.004; fresh: 35% vs. 47%, p<0.001) than those ineligible for SNAP. Among SNAP participants, cooking >6times/week was associated with greater vegetable consumption compared to cooking <2times/week (175g vs. 98g, p=0.003). SNAP-eligible individuals who cooked ≥2times/week were more to report price (medium cookers: 47% vs. 33%, p=0.001; high cookers: 52% vs. 40%, p<0.001), ease of preparation (medium cookers: 36% vs. 28%, p=0.002; high cookers: 36% vs. 24%, p<0.001) and how long food keeps (medium cookers: 57% vs. 45%, p<0.001; high cookers: 61% vs. 50%, p<0.001) as important compared to SNAP-ineligible individuals.

conclusionsFruit and vegetable consumption in the United States is low regardless of cooking frequency. Efforts to improve diet quality should consider values on which food purchases are based.

Indexed as

DietFood AssistanceFruitVegetablesCookingCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleNutrition SurveysPovertyUnited StatesAdultsCooking frequencyDiet qualityFruits and vegetablesIncome statusSNAP

Identifiers

PMID25847732
PMCPMC4466151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.