Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25846741›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2015

Next steps for birth defects research and prevention: The birth defects study to evaluate pregnancy exposures (BD-STEPS).

Sarah C Tinker, Suzan L Carmichael, Marlene Anderka, Marilyn L Browne, Kristin M Caspers Conway, Robert E Meyer, Wendy N Nembhard, Richard S Olney, Jennita Reefhuis, Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maternal Smoking and Preterm Birth Among Infants With Orofacial Clefts.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Editorial perspectives from the founding CDC leadership of the National Birth Defects Prevention study.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah C TinkerNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Suzan L CarmichaelDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Marlene AnderkaCenter for Birth Defects Research and Prevention at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marilyn L BrowneCongenital Malformations Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
Kristin M Caspers ConwayDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Robert E MeyerBirth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Richard S OlneyNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jennita ReefhuisNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS

Funding

HSRD VA CDP 13-003Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS (BD-STEPS) is a population-based, multi-Center case-control study of modifiable risk factors for selected birth defects in the United States. BD-STEPS is the second major research effort of the Centers for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, which extends and expands the initial research effort, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).

methodsBD-STEPS focuses on 17 categories of structural birth defects selected based on severity, prevalence, consistent ascertainment, and previous findings that warrant additional research. Cases are identified through existing birth defects surveillance programs; controls are from vital records or birth hospital logs from the same catchment area. BD-STEPS uses a standardized computer-assisted telephone interview to collect information from case and control mothers on topics including demographics, health conditions, and medication use. Following the maternal interview, selected Centers request permission to sample residual newborn screening blood spots from state repositories for genetic analyses. New components planned for BD-STEPS include linkages with external datasets and use of online questionnaires to collect in-depth information on selected exposures.

resultsBD-STEPS extends NBDPS by continuing to collect data on many exposures that were assessed in NBDPS, allowing data from both studies to be combined and providing an unprecedented sample size to analyze rare exposures. BD-STEPS expands upon NBDPS by collecting more detailed information on existing exposures as well as new exposures.

conclusionThe goal of BD-STEPS is to provide women and healthcare providers with information they need to make decisions to promote the healthiest pregnancy possible.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchCase-Control StudiesCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal ExposureNeonatal ScreeningPregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsUnited Statesbirth defectscase-controlcongenital anomaliesepidemiologypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID25846741
PMCPMC4537667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.