Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25846699›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2015

Influenza virus antigenicity and broadly neutralizing epitopes.

Gillian M Air

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antigenic characterization of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential immune imprinting by influenza virus vaccination and infection in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Natural antibodies - facts known and unknown.Central-European journal of immunology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Special Connection between γδ T Cells and Natural Antibodies?Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gillian M AirDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, PO Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, United States. Electronic address: Gillian-air@ouhsc.edu.

Funding

Human & mouse antibodies against influenza virusR01AI050933 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI AIR, GILLIAN M · 2003 to 2012
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaccine formulation that would be effective against all strains of influenza virus has long been a goal of vaccine developers, but antibodies after infection or vaccination were seen to be strain specific and there was little evidence of cross-reactive antibodies that neutralized across subtypes. Recently a number of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have been characterized. This review describes the different classes of broadly neutralizing antibodies and discusses the potential of their therapeutic use or for design of immunogens that induce a high proportion of broadly neutralizing antibodies.

Indexed as

Cross ReactionsImmunity, HeterologousAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralEpitopesHumansOrthomyxoviridaeAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID25846699
PMCPMC4456283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.