ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2015
Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
144 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bone regeneration materials and their application over 20 years: A bibliometric study and systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Nanofiber Technology for Regenerative Engineering.ACS nano · 2020Pooled it
- Biomaterial-mediated blood clot formation: a key to unlocking osteogenic synergy for bone regeneration.Bone research · 2026Review
- Hollow Glass Microspheres (HGMs): Synthesis, Characterization, and Processes in Biomedical Applications-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- One-Step Synthesis of Cytocompatible Brushite-Mineralized Gellan Gum/Alginate Microgels via a Temperature-Controlled Approach.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Enabled Modulation of the Bone Immune Microenvironment for Enhanced Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D printed nano-hydroxyapatite scaffold combined with BMSCs cell sheet containing concentrated growth factor (CGF) for enhancing bone regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Bone Alloplastic Materials: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds Containing SiOACS omega · 2026Review
- Assessing the Angiogenic Potential of Poly(ε-Caprolactone) PCL/Bioactive Glass Composites in a Co-Culture Model of ASCs and HMEC-1.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Emerging Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: From In Vitro Insights to In Vivo Clinical Translation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Material-dependent effects of injectable platelet rich-fibrin on growth factor release, inflammation, and osteoclast activity: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Complexities of Bone Implants and Stents: Factors Influencing Successful Tissue Integration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Guided Bone Regeneration Membrane Materials Loaded with Chimeric Nanovesicles Promote Early Bone Defect Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Research Progress on Personalized Bone Implants Based on Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Human platelet-derived extracellular vesicle fractions modulate bone cell metabolism and biologize volume-stable β-TCP matrix in vitro.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Biomaterials: Design Strategies, Clinical Translation, and the Rise of Intelligent Therapeutic Platforms.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Bioactive, PDMS-containing shape memory composite scaffolds with accelerated degradation rates.Polymer · 2025Article
84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strategies for bone tissue regeneration have been continuously evolving for the last 25 years since the introduction of the "tissue engineering" concept. The convergence of the life, physical, and engineering sciences has brought in several advanced technologies available to tissue engineers and scientists. This resulted in the creation of a new multidisciplinary field termed as "regenerative engineering". In this article, the role of biomaterials in bone regenerative engineering is systematically reviewed to elucidate the new design criteria for the next generation of biomaterials for bone regenerative engineering. The exemplary design of biomaterials harnessing various materials characteristics towards successful bone defect repair and regeneration is highlighted. Particular attention is given to the attempts of incorporating advanced materials science, stem cell technologies, and developmental biology into biomaterials design to engineer and develop the next generation bone grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.