Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25845810›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2015

Intensity of prolactinoma on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: towards another gender difference.

Julie Kreutz, Laurent Vroonen, Francoise Cattin, Patrick Petrossians, Albert Thiry, Liliya Rostomyan, Luaba Tshibanda, Albert Beckers, Jean-François Bonneville

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie KreutzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium, julie.kreutz@icloud.com.
Laurent Vroonen
Francoise Cattin
Patrick Petrossians
Albert Thiry
Liliya Rostomyan
Luaba Tshibanda
Albert Beckers
Jean-François Bonneville
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical presentations of prolactinomas are quite different between genders. In comparison with women's prolactinoma, those in men showed predominance of large tumors with high prolactin (PRL) levels. This preponderance could be attributed to a greater proliferative potential of the tumors. Differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal at diagnosis have not been yet clearly evaluated.

methodsWe conduct a retrospective study comparing MRI signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted images (T2-WI) between 41 men and 41 women to investigate whether or not men prolactinoma present specific features.

resultsIn addition to the size of the adenoma and PRL levels (P < 0001), prolactinomas in men also exhibit differences from those in women in signal on T2-WI on MRI (P < 0001). Women's prolactinomas are mostly of high SI on T2-WI while men's prolactinomas exhibit a more heterogeneous pattern of SI on T2-WI. Prolactinomas presenting with low SI on T2-WI are almost exclusively encountered in men.

conclusionsPresence of T2-WI hypointensities in pituitary adenoma can be predictive of a different subtype of prolactinoma almost encountered in men and possibly translate the presence of spherical amyloid deposits, in agreement with the literature.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsPlaque, AmyloidProlactinProlactinomaRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsProlactin

Identifiers

PMID25845810
OpenAlexW2084792510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.