Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25845756›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2016

Arabidopsis flower development--of protein complexes, targets, and transport.

Annette Becker, Katrin Ehlers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annette BeckerInstitute of Botany, Justus-Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, 35392, Gießen, Germany. annette.becker@bot1.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Katrin EhlersInstitute of Botany, Justus-Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, 35392, Gießen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tremendous progress has been achieved over the past 25 years or more of research on the molecular mechanisms of floral organ identity, patterning, and development. While collections of floral homeotic mutants of Antirrhinum majus laid the foundation already at the beginning of the previous century, it was the genetic analysis of these mutants in A. majus and Arabidopsis thaliana that led to the development of the ABC model of floral organ identity more than 20 years ago. This intuitive model kick-started research focused on the genetic mechanisms regulating flower development, using mainly A. thaliana as a model plant. In recent years, interactions among floral homeotic proteins have been elucidated, and their direct and indirect target genes are known to a large extent. Here, we provide an overview over the advances in understanding the molecular mechanism orchestrating A. thaliana flower development. We focus on floral homeotic protein complexes, their target genes, evidence for their transport in floral primordia, and how these new results advance our view on the processes downstream of floral organ identity, such as organ boundary formation or floral organ patterning.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, HomeoboxGenes, PlantMADS Domain ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesProtein TransportArabidopsis ProteinsMADS Domain ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesArabidopsis thalianaFloral homeotic genesFlower developmentMADS-box protein target genesProtein complexesProtein transport

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.