Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25845746›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2015

Differential odor sensitivity in PTSD: Implications for treatment and future research.

Bernadette M Cortese, Kimberly Leslie, Thomas W Uhde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Worry Level on Recall Memory for Odors in ApoE-ε4 Carriers and Non-Carriers.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Neurobiology of Fear Generalization.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  18. Paradoxical olfactory function in combat veterans: The role of PTSD and odor factors.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernadette M CorteseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, 67 President Street, MSC 861, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. Electronic address: corteseb@musc.edu.
Kimberly LeslieDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, 67 President Street, MSC 861, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Thomas W UhdeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, 67 President Street, MSC 861, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Trauma-Related Olfactory Cues in Posttraumatic Stress DisorderK01MH090548 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CORTESE, BERNADETTE · 2011 to 2015
$730k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH090548NIMH NIH HHS K01MH090548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that odors enhance the retrieval of autobiographical memories, induce physiological arousal, and trigger trauma-related flashbacks, it is reasonable to hypothesize that odors play a significant role in the pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For these reasons, this preliminary study sought to examine self-reported, odor-elicited distress in PTSD.

methodsCombat veterans with (N=30) and without (N=22) PTSD and healthy controls (HC: N=21), completed an olfactory questionnaire that provided information on the hedonic valence of odors as well as their ability to elicit distress or relaxation.

resultsTwo main findings were revealed: Compared to HC, CV+PTSD, but not CV-PTSD, reported a higher prevalence of distress to a limited number of select odors that included fuel (p=.004), blood (p=.02), gunpowder (p=.03), and burning hair (p=.02). In contrast to this increased sensitivity, a blunting effect was reported by both groups of veterans compared to HC that revealed lower rates of distress and relaxation in response to negative hedonic odors (p=.03) and positive hedonic odors (p<.001), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its use of retrospective survey methods, whereas future investigations would benefit from laboratory measures taken prior, during, and after deployment.

conclusionThe present findings suggest a complex role of olfaction in the biological functions of threat detection. Several theoretical models are discussed. One possible explanation for increased sensitivity to select odors with decreased sensitivity to other odors is the co-occurrence of attentional bias toward threat odors with selective ignoring of distractor odors. Working together, these processes may optimize survival.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAdultAttentionCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMemory, EpisodicMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransYoung AdultAttentional biasFearOdor SensitivityOdor threat cuesOlfactionPTSD

Identifiers

PMID25845746
PMCPMC4437877
OpenAlexW2134033451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.