Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25845398›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2015

Nanoparticle Estrogen in Rat Spinal Cord Injury Elicits Rapid Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Tissue.

April Cox, Abhay Varma, John Barry, Alexey Vertegel, Naren Banik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis after Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Time-to-treatment window and cross-sex potential of βToxicology and applied pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

April Cox1 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Abhay Varma1 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
John Barry2 Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University , Clemson, South Carolina.
Alexey Vertegel2 Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University , Clemson, South Carolina.
Naren Banik1 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Clemson University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · US

Funding

ROLE OF PROTEINASE IN SPINAL CORD INJURYR01NS031622 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BANIK, NAREN L · 1994 to 2011
$3.4M
MUSC FACIL EXPANSION &RENOV: SLE C06RR015455 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 2002 to 2002
$2.0M
ESTROGEN EFFICACY IN SPINAL CORD INJURYR01NS045967 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BANIK, NAREN L · 2003 to 2006
$996k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015455NINDS NIH HHS NS-45967NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-31622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) are in need of effective therapeutics. Estrogen (E2), as a steroid hormone, is a highly pleiotropic agent; with anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neurotrophic properties, it is ideal for use in treatment of patients with SCI. Safety concerns around the use of high doses of E2 have limited clinical application, however. To address these concerns, low doses of E2 (25 μg and 2.5 μg) were focally delivered to the injured spinal cord using nanoparticles. A per-acute model (6 h after injury) was used to assess nanoparticle release of E2 into damaged spinal cord tissue; in addition, E2 was evaluated as a rapid anti-inflammatory. To assess inflammation, 27-plex cytokine/chemokine arrays were conducted in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and spinal cord tissue. A particular focus was placed on IL-6, GRO-KC, and MCP-1 as these have been identified from CSF in human studies as potential biomarkers in SCI. S100β, an additional proposed biomarker, was also assessed in spinal cord tissue only. Tissue concentrations of E2 were double those found in the plasma, indicating focal release. E2 showed rapid anti-inflammatory effects, significantly reducing interleukin (IL)-6, GRO-KC, MCP-1, and S100β in one or all compartments. Numerous additional targets of rapid E2 modulation were identified including: leptin, MIP-1α, IL-4, IL-2, IL-10, IFNγ, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc. These data further elucidate the rapid anti-inflammatory effects E2 exerts in an acute rat SCI model, have identified additional targets of estrogen efficacy, and suggest nanoparticle delivered estrogen may provide a safe and efficacious treatment option in persons with acute SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersChemokinesCytokinesDrug Delivery SystemsEstradiolInflammationMaleNanoparticlesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiomarkersChemokinesCytokinesEstradiolS100b protein, ratS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitCSFestrogenGRO-KCIL-6MCP-1nanoparticleS100βspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25845398
PMCPMC4575544
OpenAlexW1898412919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.