Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844834›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2015

Randomized controlled trial of brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students for heavy-drinking mandated and volunteer undergraduates: 12-month outcomes.

Meredith A Terlecki, Julia D Buckner, Mary E Larimer, Amy L Copeland

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Does self-affirmation augment the effects of a mandated personalized feedback intervention? A randomized controlled trial with heavy drinking college students.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Protective behavioral strategies underutilization mediates effect of a brief motivational intervention among socially anxious undergraduate drinkers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thirty years of BASICS: Dissemination and implementation progress and challenges.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Article
  11. Peer pressure: Conformity outweighs reciprocity in social anxiety.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith A TerleckiDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University.
Julia D BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University.
Mary E LarimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Amy L CopelandDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University.
Louisiana State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Integrated CBT for Cannabis Dependence with Co-occurring Anxiety DisordersR34DA031937 · NIDA · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI BUCKNER, JULIA D, ZVOLENSKY, MICHAEL J. · 2012 to 2014
$624k
Multi-method Assessment of Affective and Situational Antecedents of Marijuana UseR21DA029811 · NIDA · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI BUCKNER, JULIA D · 2011 to 2012
$360k
Brief Alcohol Intervention for Heavy Drinking Mandated College StudentsF31AA017565 · NIAAA · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI TERLECKI, MEREDITH A · 2010 to 2010
$34k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA017565NIAAA NIH HHS F31AA017565NIDA NIH HHS 1R34DA031937-01A1NIDA NIH HHS 5R21DA029811-02NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA029811NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA031937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first randomized trial testing whether heavy-drinking undergraduates mandated to the Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) program following a campus alcohol violation would benefit as much as heavy-drinking volunteers up to 1 year postintervention using control groups with high-risk drinkers to model disciplinary-related and naturalistic changes in drinking. Participants (61% male; 51% mandated; 84% Caucasian; M age = 20.14 years) were screened for heavy drinking and randomized to BASICS (n = 115) or assessment-only control (n = 110). Outcome measures (drinking, alcohol problems) were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention. At 4 weeks postintervention, intent-to-treat multilevel longitudinal models showed that regardless of referral group (mandated or volunteer), BASICS significantly decreased weekly drinking, typical drinks, and peak drinks relative to controls (ds = .41-.92). BASICS had a large effect on decreases in alcohol problems (d = .87). At 12 months postintervention, BASICS participants (regardless of referral group) reported significantly fewer alcohol problems (d = .56) compared with controls. Significant long-term intervention gains for peak and typical drinks were sustained in both referral groups relative to controls (ds = .42; .11). Referral group had no significant main effect and did not interact with intervention condition to predict outcomes. Given that BASICS was associated with less drinking and fewer alcohol problems (even among heavier drinking mandated students up to 1 year postintervention), provision of BASICS-style programs within disciplinary settings may help reduce heavy and problematic drinking among at-risk students. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapyStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25844834
PMCPMC4388044
OpenAlexW2092675750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.