Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844730›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015

Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.

Hannah Arem, Steven C Moore, Alpa Patel, Patricia Hartge, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Kala Visvanathan, Peter T Campbell, Michal Freedman, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans Olov Adami and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04165473 (A Training Program for Developing Social- and Personal Resources and Its Effects on Emotional, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 678 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
678citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04165473 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Training Program for Developing Social- and Personal Resources and Its Effects on Emotional, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled223ConditionsStress, Psychological, Stress, Emotional, Health Behavior, Satisfaction, PersonalArmsTraining Program for Developing Social- and Personal Resources
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

678 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical inactivity in chronic airways disease: an important candidate in the treatable traits paradigm.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Highlights a Link Between Aerobic Fitness and Telomere Maintenance.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

618 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hannah AremDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Steven C MooreDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alpa PatelAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Patricia HartgeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Amy Berrington de GonzalezDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kala VisvanathanJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter T CampbellAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michal FreedmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Elisabete WeiderpassDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden5Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø6Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo7Department of Genetic Epidemiolog.
Hans Olov AdamiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden8Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martha S LinetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
I-Min LeeDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Charles E MatthewsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-upR01CA047988 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 1991 to 2014
$28.2M
Physical Activity, Energy Balance, and CancerZIACP010197 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBANES, DEMETRIUS · 2009 to 2025
$17.5M
Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-UpR01HL080467 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E. · 2005 to 2010
$4.5M
The Women's Health Study: Infrastructure Support for Continued Cohort Follow-upUM1CA182913 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 2014 to 2018
$4.0M
GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS: THE ODYSSEY COHORTU01AG018033 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOFFMAN, SANDRA · 1999 to 2003
$2.8M
DNA Repair, Skin Cancer and Overall Cancer RiskR01CA105069 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ALBERG, ANTHONY J · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
TRIAL OF VITAMIN E, BETA-CAROTENE &ASPRIN IN WOMENR01HL043851 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E · 1991 to 2000
$1.6M
The Women's Health Study: Addition of New Data to Maximize its Research ImpactRC1HL099355 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E. · 2009 to 2010
$992k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS CA047988NCI NIH HHS CA105069NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047988NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105069NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182913NHLBI NIH HHS HL080467NHLBI NIH HHS HL099355NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL043851NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080467NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL099355NIA NIH HHS U01 AG018033NIA NIH HHS U01 AG18033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommended a minimum of 75 vigorous-intensity or 150 moderate-intensity minutes per week (7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week) of aerobic activity for substantial health benefit and suggested additional benefits by doing more than double this amount. However, the upper limit of longevity benefit or possible harm with more physical activity is unclear.

objectiveTo quantify the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity and mortality and define the upper limit of benefit or harm associated with increased levels of physical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe pooled data from 6 studies in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium (baseline 1992-2003). Population-based prospective cohorts in the United States and Europe with self-reported physical activity were analyzed in 2014. A total of 661,137 men and women (median age, 62 years; range, 21-98 years) and 116,686 deaths were included. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with cohort stratification to generate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Median follow-up time was 14.2 years. EXPOSURES: Leisure time moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The upper limit of mortality benefit from high levels of leisure time physical activity.

resultsCompared with individuals reporting no leisure time physical activity, we observed a 20% lower mortality risk among those performing less than the recommended minimum of 7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]), a 31% lower risk at 1 to 2 times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70]), and a 37% lower risk at 2 to 3 times the minimum (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.62-0.65]). An upper threshold for mortality benefit occurred at 3 to 5 times the physical activity recommendation (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.62]); however, compared with the recommended minimum, the additional benefit was modest (31% vs 39%). There was no evidence of harm at 10 or more times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]). A similar dose-response relationship was observed for mortality due to cardiovascular disease and to cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Meeting the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans minimum by either moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities was associated with nearly the maximum longevity benefit. We observed a benefit threshold at approximately 3 to 5 times the recommended leisure time physical activity minimum and no excess risk at 10 or more times the minimum. In regard to mortality, health care professionals should encourage inactive adults to perform leisure time physical activity and do not need to discourage adults who already participate in high-activity levels.

Indexed as

ExerciseMortalityRecreationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25844730
PMCPMC4451435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.