Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844685›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Malaria invasion ligand RH5 and its prime candidacy in blood-stage malaria vaccine design.

Rosalynn L Ord, Marilis Rodriguez, Cheryl A Lobo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Cellular and Molecular Interaction Between Erythrocytes andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. CRISPR/Cas9 knockouts reveal genetic interaction between strain-transcendent erythrocyte determinants ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Potential ofIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosalynn L Orda Blood-Borne Parasites; Lindsley Kimball Research Institute; New York Blood Center ; New York , NY , USA.
Marilis Rodriguez
Cheryl A Lobo

Funding

AIDS VACCINE EVALUATION UNITSN01AI045210 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, PETER F · 1994 to 2000
$114k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-N01-045210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With drug resistance to available therapeutics continuing to develop against Plasmodium falciparum malaria, the development of an effective vaccine candidate remains a major research goal. Successful interruption of invasion of parasites into erythrocytes during the blood stage of infection will prevent the severe clinical symptoms and complications associated with malaria. Previously studied blood stage antigens have highlighted the hurdles that are inherent to this life-cycle stage, namely that highly immunogenic antigens are also globally diverse, resulting in protection only against the vaccine strain, or that naturally acquired immunity to blood stage antigens do not always correlate with actual protection. The blood stage antigen reticulocyte binding homolog RH5 is essential for parasite viability, has globally limited diversity, and is associated with protection from disease. Here we summarize available information on this invasion ligand and recent findings that highlight its candidacy for inclusion in a blood-stage malaria vaccine.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsDrug DiscoveryHumansMalariaMalaria VaccinesCarrier ProteinsMalaria VaccinesRH5 protein, Plasmodium falciparuminvasionmalaria vaccinePlasmodium falciparumRH5vaccine development

Identifiers

PMID25844685
PMCPMC4514319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.