Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844631›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015

Effects of caffeine and its metabolite paraxanthine on intracranial self-stimulation in male rats.

Matthew F Lazenka, F Gerard Moeller, S Stevens Negus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew F LazenkaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
F Gerard MoellerInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University.
S Stevens NegusDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN THE PHARMACOLOGY OF ABUSED DRUGST32DA007027 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI William L. Dewey · 1985 to 2026
$14.7M
Medications Development for Stimulant AbuseR01DA026946 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S · 2009 to 2019
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026946NIDA NIH HHS R01DA026946NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007027NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine is the most widely used psychostimulant in the world, though preclinical studies suggest weaker evidence for abuse-related effects than stimulants with high abuse liability, such as amphetamine or cocaine. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is 1 procedure used to assess the abuse liability of drugs, and previous studies have produced mixed results regarding whether caffeine produces an abuse-related facilitation of ICSS. This study assessed both caffeine and its main metabolite in humans, paraxanthine, using a frequency-rate ICSS procedure and compared their effects to those of amphetamine and cocaine. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with intracranial electrodes targeting the medial forebrain bundle and trained to respond under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule for brain stimulation that varied across a range of frequencies (56-158 Hz in 0.05 log increments). Data analysis focused on 3 dependent measures: reinforced responding (defined as responses that produced brain stimulation), nonreinforced responding (defined as responses that occurred during each 0.5 s brain stimulation and that did not produce additional stimulation), and total responding (reinforced plus nonreinforced responding). Both amphetamine and cocaine produced robust increases in total, reinforced, and nonreinforced responses. Caffeine also increased total, reinforced, and nonreinforced responses, but the caffeine dose-effect curve had an inverted-U shape, and peak ICSS facilitation was less than that produced by amphetamine or cocaine. Paraxanthine increased only total responses and nonreinforced responses. These results suggest that paraxanthine has low abuse liability and does not mediate abuse-related effects of caffeine.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsCaffeineConditioning, OperantMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationSelf StimulationTheophylline1,7-dimethylxanthineCaffeineTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID25844631
PMCPMC4389645
OpenAlexW2322257021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.