ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015
Effects of caffeine and its metabolite paraxanthine on intracranial self-stimulation in male rats.
Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paraxanthine and azilsartan attenuate gentamicin-induced renal fibrosis via modulation of TGF-β1/Smad3/7 signaling and miRNA-21/miRNA-200b expression.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Paraxanthine safety and comparison to caffeine.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Molecular networking based LC/MS reveals novel biotransformation products of green coffee by ex vivo cultures of the human gut microbiome.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2020Article
- Essential Control of the Function of the Striatopallidal Neuron by Pre-coupled Complexes of Adenosine AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Opposing effects of dopamine D1- and D2-like agonists on intracranial self-stimulation in male rats.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2016Article
- Mechanisms of the psychostimulant effects of caffeine: implications for substance use disorders.Psychopharmacology · 2016Review
- Preclinical Abuse Potential Assessment of Flibanserin: Effects on Intracranial Self-Stimulation in Female and Male Rats.The journal of sexual medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Caffeine is the most widely used psychostimulant in the world, though preclinical studies suggest weaker evidence for abuse-related effects than stimulants with high abuse liability, such as amphetamine or cocaine. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is 1 procedure used to assess the abuse liability of drugs, and previous studies have produced mixed results regarding whether caffeine produces an abuse-related facilitation of ICSS. This study assessed both caffeine and its main metabolite in humans, paraxanthine, using a frequency-rate ICSS procedure and compared their effects to those of amphetamine and cocaine. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with intracranial electrodes targeting the medial forebrain bundle and trained to respond under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule for brain stimulation that varied across a range of frequencies (56-158 Hz in 0.05 log increments). Data analysis focused on 3 dependent measures: reinforced responding (defined as responses that produced brain stimulation), nonreinforced responding (defined as responses that occurred during each 0.5 s brain stimulation and that did not produce additional stimulation), and total responding (reinforced plus nonreinforced responding). Both amphetamine and cocaine produced robust increases in total, reinforced, and nonreinforced responses. Caffeine also increased total, reinforced, and nonreinforced responses, but the caffeine dose-effect curve had an inverted-U shape, and peak ICSS facilitation was less than that produced by amphetamine or cocaine. Paraxanthine increased only total responses and nonreinforced responses. These results suggest that paraxanthine has low abuse liability and does not mediate abuse-related effects of caffeine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.