Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25844403›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Congress on Evolutionary Computation2014

Multi-Dimensional Scaling and MODELLER-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Model Refinement.

Yan Chen, Yi Shang, Dong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan Chen
Yi Shang
Dong Xu
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Development of MUFOLD for Building High-Accuracy Protein Structure ModelsR01GM100701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XU, DONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure prediction, i.e., computationally predicting the three-dimensional structure of a protein from its primary sequence, is one of the most important and challenging problems in bioinformatics. Model refinement is a key step in the prediction process, where improved structures are constructed based on a pool of initially generated models. Since the refinement category was added to the biennial Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) in 2008, CASP results show that it is a challenge for existing model refinement methods to improve model quality consistently. This paper presents three evolutionary algorithms for protein model refinement, in which multidimensional scaling(MDS), the MODELLER software, and a hybrid of both are used as crossover operators, respectively. The MDS-based method takes a purely geometrical approach and generates a child model by combining the contact maps of multiple parents. The MODELLER-based method takes a statistical and energy minimization approach, and uses the remodeling module in MODELLER program to generate new models from multiple parents. The hybrid method first generates models using the MDS-based method and then run them through the MODELLER-based method, aiming at combining the strength of both. Promising results have been obtained in experiments using CASP datasets. The MDS-based method improved the best of a pool of predicted models in terms of the global distance test score (GDT-TS) in 9 out of 16test targets.

Indexed as

evolutionary algorithmMODELLERMultidimensional scalingprotein model refinement

Identifiers

PMID25844403
PMCPMC4380876
OpenAlexW2031471721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.