ReviewInterface focus2015
Applications of computational models to better understand microvascular remodelling: a focus on biomechanical integration across scales.
Review in Interface focus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Modeling Unveils the Impact of Tissue Growth and Vascular Remodeling on the Distribution of Interstitial Chemical Species.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Multi-scale modeling and simulation of skeletal muscles with different fatigue degrees based on microphysiology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Regulation of cell fate by cell imprinting approach in vitro.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
- Systems biology of angiogenesis signaling: Computational models and omics.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- Regenerated Microvascular Networks in Ischemic Skeletal Muscle.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Microvascular bioengineering: a focus on pericytes.Journal of biological engineering · 2019Review
- Multi-scale Modeling of the Cardiovascular System: Disease Development, Progression, and Clinical Intervention.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Microvascular network remodelling is a common denominator for multiple pathologies and involves both angiogenesis, defined as the sprouting of new capillaries, and network patterning associated with the organization and connectivity of existing vessels. Much of what we know about microvascular remodelling at the network, cellular and molecular scales has been derived from reductionist biological experiments, yet what happens when the experiments provide incomplete (or only qualitative) information? This review will emphasize the value of applying computational approaches to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and effects of microvascular remodelling. Examples of individual computational models applied to each of the scales will highlight the potential of answering specific questions that cannot be answered using typical biological experimentation alone. Looking into the future, we will also identify the needs and challenges associated with integrating computational models across scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.